On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 09:14:57PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> The reason for so much delay was a serious accident which resulted in 2
> weeks of hospitalization with no Internet connnectivity (and no mental
> state for work).
>
> Sorry about that.
Hey Marcelo,
you don't have to apologize
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 07:02:01PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 10:01:41AM -0700, Benjamin Cherian wrote:
> > Willy,
> > Sorry I didn't notice your email till now.
>
> no problem.
>
> > On Friday 04 August 2006 09:55, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > The probl
Hi Benjamin,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 10:01:41AM -0700, Benjamin Cherian wrote:
> Willy,
> Sorry I didn't notice your email till now.
no problem.
> On Friday 04 August 2006 09:55, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > The problem is that Marcelo is very very busy those days (as you might have
> > noticed from
Willy,
Sorry I didn't notice your email till now.
On Friday 04 August 2006 09:55, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> The problem is that Marcelo is very very busy those days (as you might have
> noticed from the delay between each release), and there are a good bunch of
> security fixes in -rc3 which should w
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 09:57:04AM -0700, Benjamin Cherian wrote:
> Willy,
>
> On Wednesday 02 August 2006 23:29, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Perfect. Patch queued, thanks Pete.
>
> Do you know if it would be possible for this to get into 2.4.33? I know its
> already at rc3, but it would be nice if
Willy,
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 23:29, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Perfect. Patch queued, thanks Pete.
Do you know if it would be possible for this to get into 2.4.33? I know its
already at rc3, but it would be nice if this patch could be pushed out sooner
since 2.4.34 will probably not be out fo
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:00:58PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Replace the semaphore exclusive_access with an open-coded lock for
> the special use. The lock can be taken for: read, write, and both.
> This way, two bulk URBs can be submitted simultaneously with ioctl
> USBDEVFS_BULK: one read and
Replace the semaphore exclusive_access with an open-coded lock for
the special use. The lock can be taken for: read, write, and both.
This way, two bulk URBs can be submitted simultaneously with ioctl
USBDEVFS_BULK: one read and one write. Such access was possible
before 2.4.28.
Signed-off-By: Pet
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:02:16PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 21:51:00 +0200, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Pete, do you consider your work as appropriate for mainline ? In this
> > case, I can queue it for 2.4.34.
>
> Yes, please use the attached patch. The
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 21:51:00 +0200, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pete, do you consider your work as appropriate for mainline ? In this
> case, I can queue it for 2.4.34.
Yes, please use the attached patch. The one I sent for testing
missed necessary exports. This is also tested with
Hi Benjamin, Hi Pete,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:41:28AM -0700, Benjamin Cherian wrote:
> Hi Pete,
>
> >How about now?
>
> Much better! For me, everything seems to be working. No segfaults, and
> everything seems to work.
That's very good news.
Pete, do you consider your work as appropriate f
Hi Pete,
>How about now?
Much better! For me, everything seems to be working. No segfaults, and
everything seems to work.
Thanks,
Ben
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay pa
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:21:37 -0700, Benjamin Cherian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 24 July 2006 23:07, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > Anyway, please test the attached patch. Does it do what you want?
>
> Sorry to say that it doesnt. When calling usb_get_string_simple in libusb,
> the program se
On Monday 24 July 2006 23:07, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Anyway, please test the attached patch. Does it do what you want?
Sorry to say that it doesnt. When calling usb_get_string_simple in libusb, the
program segfaults with the patched kernel. I believe that
usb_get_string_simple eventually calls us
Hi Pete,
Thanks for the reply.
> By the way, you didn't tell me if you tried to use alarm(2) across
> submitted URBs. This is the technique ADSL modem drivers use. They
> also have to have input and output streams running simultaneously.
I'm making a library to operate my device, and I don't want
Hi Pete,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 11:07:32PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:43:59 -0700, Benjamin Cherian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > > Although I am starting to think about creating a custom locking
> > > scheme in devio.c after all. It seems like less work.
>
> > Wh
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:21:37 -0700, Benjamin Cherian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 24 July 2006 23:07, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > Anyway, please test the attached patch. Does it do what you want?
>
> Sorry to say that it doesnt. When calling usb_get_string_simple in libusb,
> the program se
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:43:59 -0700, Benjamin Cherian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Although I am starting to think about creating a custom locking
> > scheme in devio.c after all. It seems like less work.
> What's your timeframe for this? Good luck with it.
OK, now I hate my life, I hate you, I
Pete,
Thanks for the reply.
> > All right then. I'll send you a patch that backports the string caching
> > mechanism from 2.6 in a few days. Would you be able to test it with the
> > 210PU?
>
> Yes, that would be fine.
We should get back to you in a couple weeks with this.
> Although I am start
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:35:21 -0700, Benjamin Cherian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm skipping the discussion of the spec, but going further, here's
what we have:
> It is really looking like you are backing me into a corner to make the change
> myself. However, before doing so I'd like to say tha
20 matches
Mail list logo
