Re: [linux-usb-devel] Could USBMON be reversing the order of protocol elements?

2006-03-02 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Marc Singer wrote: > I have this: > > e2372840 1612603151 C Ci:009:00 -121 32 = 09022000 0103fac0 01090400 0002ff00 > 00fa0705 02024000 00070581 0240 > e2372840 1612603151 S Ci:009:00 s 80 06 0200 0400 1024 < > > which says to me that the callback was received befor

[linux-usb-devel] Could USBMON be reversing the order of protocol elements?

2006-03-01 Thread Marc Singer
I have this: e2372840 1612603151 C Ci:009:00 -121 32 = 09022000 0103fac0 01090400 0002ff00 00fa0705 02024000 00070581 0240 e2372840 1612603151 S Ci:009:00 s 80 06 0200 0400 1024 < which says to me that the callback was received before the submission. There is not another e2372840 URB af