Re: [linux-usb-devel] Fw: [BUG] USB Storage OOPS and a D state process in 2.6.10

2005-01-10 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Mike Anderson wrote: > > This is the first indication of something funny. I can't think how a bus > > reset would get initiated by the kernel -- that only happens after a > > timeout. Maybe it came from a user program? > > Well it can get initiated in the scsi error handler

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Fw: [BUG] USB Storage OOPS and a D state process in 2.6.10

2005-01-10 Thread Mike Anderson
Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jan 10 20:49:08 desktop kernel: scsi113 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage > devices > Jan 10 20:49:08 desktop kernel: usb-storage: device found at 113 > Jan 10 20:49:08 desktop kernel: usb-storage: waiting for device to settle > before scanning > Jan 10

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Fw: [BUG] USB Storage OOPS and a D state process in 2.6.10

2005-01-10 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:33:49PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > It's not that simple. Your log contained two different sorts of errors. > The first occurred right near the start: > > Jan 10 20:24:46 desktop kernel: usb 1-3: USB disconnect, address 3 > Jan 10 20:24:46 desktop kernel: 50-fstab-sync

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Fw: [BUG] USB Storage OOPS and a D state process in 2.6.10

2005-01-10 Thread Alan Stern
If James Bottomley, Mike Anderson, or anyone else from linux-scsi can comment on the material below, I would appreciate it. On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Srihari Vijayaraghavan wrote: > I am unable to trigger the bug, despite my sincere efforts. If nothing else, I have to admire your persistence in plug

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Fw: [BUG] USB Storage OOPS and a D state process in 2.6.10

2005-01-10 Thread Srihari Vijayaraghavan
On Monday 10 January 2005 04:32, Alan Stern wrote: > If you're unable to trigger the bug, you can try turning the debug > configuration option back off and using that patch I sent earlier. It > wouldn't hurt to use that patch even with the debugging messages... I have disabled the USB storage deb

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Fw: [BUG] USB Storage OOPS and a D state process in 2.6.10

2005-01-09 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Srihari Vijayaraghavan wrote: > On Saturday 08 January 2005 14:51, Alan Stern wrote: > > ... > > I see you didn't have CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DEBUG set when you ran this test. > > Actually I did. I do not know what log level the USB debug messages were, but > the silly syslog did

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Fw: [BUG] USB Storage OOPS and a D state process in 2.6.10

2005-01-08 Thread Srihari Vijayaraghavan
On Saturday 08 January 2005 14:51, Alan Stern wrote: > ... > I see you didn't have CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DEBUG set when you ran this test. Actually I did. I do not know what log level the USB debug messages were, but the silly syslog did not capture them. Now I have set it to write all kernel messa

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Fw: [BUG] USB Storage OOPS and a D state process in 2.6.10

2005-01-07 Thread Alan Stern
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Srihari Vijayaraghavan wrote: > Alan, > > I have made a couple of observations: > 1. While it is still easy to trigger this bug without USB Storage Debug > Option > in vanilla 2.6.10, I cannot reproduce the bug with debug option. Perhaps it > changes some timings. Certainl

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Fw: [BUG] USB Storage OOPS and a D state process in 2.6.10

2005-01-07 Thread Alan Stern
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Srihari Vijayaraghavan wrote: > Though I could not trigger an OOPS with debug option yet, I have managed to > trigger a D state "hald" process: > > Jan 8 12:41:45 desktop kernel: hald D 01003fb24478 0 3369 > > 1 4163 3006 (NOTLB) > Jan 8 1

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Fw: [BUG] USB Storage OOPS and a D state process in 2.6.10

2005-01-07 Thread Srihari Vijayaraghavan
On Saturday 08 January 2005 11:43, Srihari Vijayaraghavan wrote: > ... > 1. While it is still easy to trigger this bug without USB Storage Debug > Option in vanilla 2.6.10, I cannot reproduce the bug with debug option. > Perhaps it changes some timings. (Am sorry for replying to my own email.) Tho

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Fw: [BUG] USB Storage OOPS and a D state process in 2.6.10

2005-01-07 Thread Srihari Vijayaraghavan
On Thursday 06 January 2005 02:50, Alan Stern wrote: > ... > Srihari, can you try reproducing this after rebuilding the usb-storage > driver with CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DEBUG=y? Alan, I have made a couple of observations: 1. While it is still easy to trigger this bug without USB Storage Debug Option

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Fw: [BUG] USB Storage OOPS and a D state process in 2.6.10

2005-01-06 Thread Srihari Vijayaraghavan
On Thursday 06 January 2005 02:50, Alan Stern wrote: > ... > Srihari, can you try reproducing this after rebuilding the usb-storage > driver with CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DEBUG=y? Alan, Sure, I shall try to trigger this bug with the debug option. (But I am afraid it would take a couple of days, as tha

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Fw: [BUG] USB Storage OOPS and a D state process in 2.6.10

2005-01-05 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > Looks like the scsi-vs-usb-storage bunfight isn't yet settled... > > > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:44:44 +1100 > From: Srihari Vijayaraghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: [BUG] USB Storage

[linux-usb-devel] Fw: [BUG] USB Storage OOPS and a D state process in 2.6.10

2005-01-05 Thread Andrew Morton
Looks like the scsi-vs-usb-storage bunfight isn't yet settled... Begin forwarded message: Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:44:44 +1100 From: Srihari Vijayaraghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [BUG] USB Storage OOPS and a D state process in 2.6.10 Can easily reproduc