On Tuesday 01 Mar 2005 04:05, David Brownell wrote:
> On Sunday 27 February 2005 10:58 am, Chris Clayton wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 Feb 2005 22:15, David Brownell wrote:
> > >
> > > If you can find some approach that works reliably, I think the right way
> > > to package it would be by defining a n
On Sunday 27 February 2005 10:58 am, Chris Clayton wrote:
> On Thursday 24 Feb 2005 22:15, David Brownell wrote:
> >
> > If you can find some approach that works reliably, I think the right way
> > to package it would be by defining a new quirk flag and kicking in the
> > logic that's needed on yo
On Thursday 24 Feb 2005 22:15, David Brownell wrote:
>
> If you can find some approach that works reliably, I think the right way
> to package it would be by defining a new quirk flag and kicking in the
> logic that's needed on your chip. Then set that flag when the PCI probe
> detects this parti
Hi,
It looks as if I somehow contrived to send a blank email yesterday, sorry about
that.
> > Mmm, spoke a bit too soon. Trying to find the sweet spot between 5 and 10
> > millisecs, I'm currently at .. 20 milliseconds. I had done some testing
> > yesterday, copying 5-6MB files to and from c
On Monday 21 February 2005 2:24 pm, Chris Clayton wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:39:51 +
> Chris Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi again.
> >
> > My word, I've put some hours into this, but I now have a 2.6.10 kernel with
> > which the built-in USB port on my Compaq Armada 7400 wo
Hi _again_
I've got it this time :-)
On Monday 21 Feb 2005 22:24, Chris Clayton wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:39:51 +
> > My word, I've put some hours into this, but I now have a 2.6.10 kernel
> > with which the built-in USB port on my Compaq Armada 7400 works. So far
> > that is, I want t
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:39:51 +
Chris Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> My word, I've put some hours into this, but I now have a 2.6.10 kernel with
> which the built-in USB port on my Compaq Armada 7400 works. So far that is, I
> want to do a bit more work on fine tuning the
Hi again.
My word, I've put some hours into this, but I now have a 2.6.10 kernel with
which the built-in USB port on my Compaq Armada 7400 works. So far that is, I
want to do a bit more work on fine tuning the duration of the delays I have
added to host/ohci-q.c::finish_unlinks() - 5 millsecond
On Sunday 06 February 2005 12:00 pm, Chris Clayton wrote:
>
> I've been doing lots of experimenting here. I eventually found that reverting
> only the changes that led to version 1.48 of host/ohci-q.c does not make
> 2.6.4 work. In fact, the changes that led to both versions 1.48 and 1.49 need
Hi again,
I've been doing lots of experimenting here. I eventually found that reverting
only the changes that led to version 1.48 of host/ohci-q.c does not make
2.6.4 work. In fact, the changes that led to both versions 1.48 and 1.49 need
to be reverted and then the timeout errors I have been e
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:38:43 -0800
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What I think happened is that patch missed something. Specifically,
> it didn't prevent the driver from setting the CLF or BLF bits while
> the queue is empty because its only endpoint is being descheduled,
> but a n
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 1:16 pm, Chris Clayton wrote:
>So the "offending" patch is the one
> that took ohci-q.c to revision 1.48. Would it help if I tried to work out
> which hunk, or hunks, of that patch cause me the problem? Or is it not
> possible to have part(s) of the patch with
Hi Dave,
Bingo!
On Monday 31 Jan 2005 20:36, David Brownell wrote:
>
> If you want to poke around at that, BitKeeper is your friend. You can
> look at the revision history of "ohci-q.c", both on the web (the website
> being http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5) or by running BK locally.
>
> - Da
On Sunday 30 January 2005 3:02 pm, Chris Clayton wrote:
> > > If all else fails, another useful data point would be whether there's
> > > some 2.6 kernel before 2.6.5 that works. There've been two classes
> > > of changes that interact here: in usbcore (notably the hub driver),
> > > and in ohci
Hi again,
Following on from yesterday, I've now built 2.6.4 and I find that attaching my
hub fails with timeout errors. So it would appear that a change between 2.6.3
and 2.6.4 is what has stopped the usb system in my laptop working. I've
looked at the changelog on kernel.org and there were qui
On Sunday 30 Jan 2005 17:08, Chris Clayton wrote:
> Thanks for the reply David.
>
> On Saturday 29 Jan 2005 22:01, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 January 2005 7:55 am, Chris Clayton wrote:
> > > I'm having trouble getting on on-board USB port working on my Compaq
> > > Aramada 7400. Well
Thanks for the reply David.
On Saturday 29 Jan 2005 22:01, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 January 2005 7:55 am, Chris Clayton wrote:
> > I'm having trouble getting on on-board USB port working on my Compaq
> > Aramada 7400. Well. I should qualify that and say that I can't get it to
> > wo
On Wednesday 26 January 2005 7:55 am, Chris Clayton wrote:
>
> I'm having trouble getting on on-board USB port working on my Compaq
> Aramada 7400. Well. I should qualify that and say that I can't get it to
> wotk with a 2.6 kernel - devices that I plug in when running a
> 2.4.{26,28} kernel or
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Chris Clayton wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Alan.
>
> On Saturday 29 Jan 2005 15:42, Alan Stern wrote:
> > A timeout like that is more likely to result from the _device_ being old
> > and slow than from the _host_ being old and slow.
>
> I see what you mean, but why then wo
Thanks for the reply Alan.
On Saturday 29 Jan 2005 15:42, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Chris Clayton wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > I didn't attract much attention with my first post :(, so I've been
> > working through the 2.6.10 USB code, following the error messages that
> > get produ
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Chris Clayton wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I didn't attract much attention with my first post :(, so I've been working
> through the 2.6.10 USB code, following the error messages that get produced
> when I attach a device (an unpowered hub), to my Armada 7400. I get as far as
>
Hi again,
I didn't attract much attention with my first post :(, so I've been working
through the 2.6.10 USB code, following the error messages that get produced
when I attach a device (an unpowered hub), to my Armada 7400. I get as far as
core/message.c::usb_start_wait_urb(). It seems that aft
Hi,
I have already posted to the linux-usb-user mail list about this, but
had no success in finding a resolution.
I'm having trouble getting on on-board USB port working on my Compaq
Aramada 7400. Well. I should qualify that and say that I can't get it to
wotk with a 2.6 kernel - devices that I
23 matches
Mail list logo
