Greg & Matt:
I'm not entirely sure about this patch. An earlier patch caused trouble
because it effectively removed the US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY flag for devices with
release number higher than 0x5009. This one might cause problems because
it explicitly goes against the immediately preceding comment in
unusual_devs.h. That comment says that these Casio digital cameras claim
to use the CBI transport when in fact they only use CB. However, there
have been two reports in the last few weeks from people getting the
"unneeded SubClass and Protocol" log messages. One of them was using a
device with release number 0x1000, right at the start of the range. The
other had a device with release number 0x5010, just beyond the end of the
current range.
Maybe Casio is marketing two different devices with different behaviors
but having the same Vendor, Product, and Release values -- I don't know.
So I think this probably should be applied, but I'm not certain.
Alan Stern
===== unusual_devs.h 1.73 vs edited =====
--- 1.73/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h Mon Oct 6 13:46:12 2003
+++ edited/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h Mon Oct 20 14:17:35 2003
@@ -548,10 +548,10 @@
* - They don't like the INQUIRY command. So we must handle this command
* of the SCSI layer ourselves.
*/
-UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x07cf, 0x1001, 0x1000, 0x5009,
+UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x07cf, 0x1001, 0x1000, 0x9999,
"Casio",
"QV DigitalCamera",
- US_SC_8070, US_PR_CB, NULL,
+ US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY ),
/* Submitted by Hartmut Wahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge
We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100
http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
