Hi again,
Working 36 hours in an 24-hour day at this driver i have some more
things to tell and some more questions.
Torsten Koschorrek wrote:
Hi,
Very good work! I think i have lots of this patches applied to our
(Konsti and me) version of the driver, but there is more patching to do.
Based on
Hi,
Philipp Schmid wrote:
Thank you for sharing your patch with us. I've finally gotten around to
merging your Nov 17 patch with my code base. It turned out to be too many
changes to just merge your patch into my code base, so instead, I've started
with your patch, applied my changes to it and the
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Olav
Kongas
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 4:47 AM
Hi Philipp,
You have done an impressive work on documenting all this.
Thanks a lot. I'm sure this will simplify the work of
others.
> (4) As Expected: define platform specific HCHWCFG_INIT, HCDMACFG_INIT,
>
Hi Philipp,
You have done an impressive work on documenting all this.
Thanks a lot. I'm sure this will simplify the work of
others.
> (4) As Expected: define platform specific HCHWCFG_INIT, HCDMACFG_INIT,
> CHIP_TYPE, ... macros (HCCHIPID_MAGIC needs to be defined specific to 1160
> or 1362 - i
Hi,
> (4) Importing Olav's first patch
> This also includes a few of my own changes and hacks for the time being.
> Olav, when do you expect you could share your patch you are currently
> working on? I would be interested to see how you have solved the ACTIVE bit
> problem. From the post below,
al Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Olav
Kongas
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 11:32 AM
To: Lothar Wassmann
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] RE: yet more on ohci-isp1362
Hi Lothar,
> I added a patch to the download area at
> ht
> > Does this mean that you prefer to keep the 1362 driver
> > separate or would you still consider adding the 116x support
> > if I am able to provide it as a cleaned up patch one day? I
> > would of course make the 116x patch apply to your then
> > latest driver version.
> >
> Yes, I'd like to g
Hi Olav,
> Until now I have made my 116x specific modifications so that
> they apply on top of your driver without affecting the
> 1362-specific stuff. Yes, there are quite some #ifdefs
> there, but still there is far more common code than chip
> specific stuff. I looked at your new patch and saw
Hi Lothar,
> I added a patch to the download area at
> http://www.karo-electronics.de/support-public.html that reflects my
> latest changes that hopefully will help you to get things working.
> Unfortunately I'm working on something completely different now, so
> that I can't invest much time in t
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Lothar Wassmann wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> > You know.. I'm getting further now in my enumeration, and it also
> > hangs when getting the device descriptor.
> >
> > My errors are these:
> > 1. I'm getting a bunch of these messages:
> > 'Badness in find_td at drivers/usb/host
Hi Michael,
> You know.. I'm getting further now in my enumeration, and it also
> hangs when getting the device descriptor.
>
> My errors are these:
> 1. I'm getting a bunch of these messages:
> 'Badness in find_td at drivers/usb/host/ohci-isp1362-emu.c:672'
> They seem to travel in packs.
I don't think I can comment on your endianness issue.
> I now have enumeration working, but it now hangs when getting the
> device
> descriptor. Hopefully I can provide you some feedback soon.
>
You know.. I'm getting further now in my enumeration, and it also
hangs when getting the device de
12 matches
Mail list logo
