In fact, here's a patch with that very change. Does
it make current 2.6.0-test kernels work "out of the box"
again with your USB modems?
Yes, it works with ELSA Microlink USB. Thanks.
Hmm. Too early. I get either a "acm: probe of 3-3:2.1 failed with error -5"
but it works or a
Unable to handle ke
David Brownell wrote:
Hmm ... maybe usbcore would be better off with a less
naive algorithm for choosing defaults. Like, preferring
configurations without proprietary device protocols.
That'd solve every cdc-acm case, and likely others.
In fact, here's a patch with that very change. Does
it make
Jamie Lokier wrote:
David Brownell wrote:
Hmm ... maybe usbcore would be better off with a less
naive algorithm for choosing defaults. Like, preferring
configurations without proprietary device protocols.
That'd solve every cdc-acm case, and likely others.
Presumably 2.4 does that, because my a
David Brownell wrote:
> Hmm ... maybe usbcore would be better off with a less
> naive algorithm for choosing defaults. Like, preferring
> configurations without proprietary device protocols.
> That'd solve every cdc-acm case, and likely others.
Presumably 2.4 does that, because my acm modem works
usb 3-3: configuration #1 chosen from 2 choices
drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c: need inactive config #2
drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c: need inactive config #2
Until we get more intelligence somewhere, do this:
# cd /sys/bus/usb/devices/3-3
# echo '2' > bConfigurationValue
#
That makes the devi
