Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: PATCH: usb-0114 (usb.h cleanup)

2002-01-18 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:43:43PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > But I see what you mean: the UHCI code has a hidden > > dependency on that layout, TD_CTRL_LS. (Sigh; the > > explicit ones are always more maintainable IMO.) > > I'll see about providing updates for those drivers. > > OK, here

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: PATCH: usb-0114 (usb.h cleanup)

2002-01-18 Thread David Brownell
> But I see what you mean: the UHCI code has a hidden > dependency on that layout, TD_CTRL_LS. (Sigh; the > explicit ones are always more maintainable IMO.) > I'll see about providing updates for those drivers. OK, here are updates to the UHCI drivers to check for dev->speed == USB_SPEED_LOW ra

[linux-usb-devel] Re: PATCH: usb-0114 (usb.h cleanup)

2002-01-16 Thread David Brownell
With the device speed in dev->speed, it's no longer needed in the "generic" pipe data structure. Which means __create_pipe() gets simpler too. But I see what you mean: the UHCI code has a hidden dependency on that layout, TD_CTRL_LS. (Sigh; the explicit ones are always more maintainable IMO.)

[linux-usb-devel] Re: PATCH: usb-0114 (usb.h cleanup)

2002-01-16 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:09:06PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > I'll send off another round of 2.5 USB patches after the next -pre > > release happens (there's not much in the queue.) > > Not much in the queue? We shouldn't let that happen... :) > > Here's a minor cleanup to that deletes s