Hi,
Just to inform you that I have a peripheral (Toshiba PDR-M70 Camera)
that recently started to work with uhci (on 2.4.19-pre8). It still does
not work with usb-uhci.
It also works with ohci.
Thanks,
Jean-Denis GIRARD
___
Don
Greg KH wrote:
> From now until July 1, I want everyone to test out both the uhci-hcd
> and usb-uhci-hcd drivers on just about every piece of hardware they
> can find. This includes SMP, UP, preempt kernels, big and little
> endian machines, and loads of different types of USB devices
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Let me (and the linux-usb-devel list) know about any thoughts you have
> pertaining to liking one of the drivers over the other one. Speed
> tests, size tests, code pretty tests, comment spelling tests,
> documentation tests, you name it, I want to k
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 07:41:22PM +0200, Peter Osterlund wrote:
> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > From now until July 1, I want everyone to test out both the uhci-hcd
> > and usb-uhci-hcd drivers on just about every piece of hardware they
> > can find.
>
> I need this patch to c
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From now until July 1, I want everyone to test out both the uhci-hcd
> and usb-uhci-hcd drivers on just about every piece of hardware they
> can find.
I need this patch to convince the Makefile to build the new drivers.
--- linux/drivers/usb/Makefile.
Uz.ytkownik Greg KH napisa?:
> On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 03:35:48PM -0400, Andre Bonin wrote:
>
>>>This is probably because you have an OHCI hardware device, not a UHCI
>>>device. What does 'lspci -v' say for your machine?
>>
>>Sorry, i'me not too familiar with the USB architecture. Anyway here i
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 03:35:48PM -0400, Andre Bonin wrote:
> >This is probably because you have an OHCI hardware device, not a UHCI
> >device. What does 'lspci -v' say for your machine?
>
> Sorry, i'me not too familiar with the USB architecture. Anyway here is
> the relevant lspci entries (n
At 10:06 PM 5/21/2002 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On a side note. Why are URBs still not SLABified ?
> > Drivers still have those silly urb pools and stuff. I thought you guys
> were
> > gonna fix that.
>
>It hasn't been proven that it's really needed. 95% of the current
>drivers create their urbs
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 09:10:04PM -0400, André Bonin wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Greg KH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 6:31 PM
> Subject: What to do with all of the USB UHCI drivers
At 09:33 PM 5/21/2002 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
>Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy wrote:
>>One-shot interrupt transfers are broken in *-hcd drivers. core/hcd.c
>>returns EINVAL if urb->interval==0.
><>
>Meanwhile, I suppose I can see wanting access to that UHCI-ism.
>However your patch would do t
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 06:04:21PM -0700, Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy wrote:
> I changed to hcd.c to allow urb->interval==0. With that change uhci-hcd
> works just fine, I can load fw and
> use the device. But usb-uhci-hcd kills the machine pretty hard (hw reset
> needed).
Do you unlink the inte
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 06:04:21PM -0700, Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy wrote:
>
> >IMO, I think testing with usb-uhci.c and uhci.c is still useful, but
> >testing with the -hcd variants is the most ideal since that will be the
> >final code base.
>
> Ok. Here is feedback on 2.5.17 uhci-hcd and usb-
>IMO, I think testing with usb-uhci.c and uhci.c is still useful, but
>testing with the -hcd variants is the most ideal since that will be the
>final code base.
Ok. Here is feedback on 2.5.17 uhci-hcd and usb-uhci-hcd.
I did not notice any difference in behavior. Both have the same
performance,
>Please test the latest version of the drivers. Both uhci and usb-uhci
>have had various bug fixes. I'm sure the performance problems you've had
>with uhci have been fixed for a little while now.
Yep. I did a quick test with Intel, Ericsson and Broadcom devices.
Both HCDs have the same performanc
On Tue, May 21, 2002, Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > So basically I vote for usb-uhci. However some things will have to be
> > > fixed. We (Bluetooth folks) have couple
> > > of devices that refuse to work with usb-uhci (I didn't test the latest
> > > usb-uhci though
> > So basically I vote for usb-uhci. However some things will have to be
> > fixed. We (Bluetooth folks) have couple
> > of devices that refuse to work with usb-uhci (I didn't test the latest
> > usb-uhci though).
>
>Sorry for the confusion, but both usb-uhci.c and uhci.c will be deleted
>anywa
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 10:23:15AM -0500, Timothy E. Jedlicka - wrk wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Ok, now that 2.5.16 is out, we have a total of 4 different USB UHCI
> > controller drivers in the kernel! That's about 3 too many for me :)
>
> Stupid follow-up question for you. Is it possi
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 12:41:39PM -0700, Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy wrote:
> Greg,
>
> I'm gonna speak for Bluetooth USB devices.
> I do have bunch of things like Kodak digi camera, Sony DV camcorder, CF
> reader, etc. But they don't
> seem to care much about which HCD is used and work equally w
On Tue, May 21, 2002, Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm gonna speak for Bluetooth USB devices.
> I do have bunch of things like Kodak digi camera, Sony DV camcorder, CF
> reader, etc. But they don't
> seem to care much about which HCD is used and work equally well with bo
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 12:41:39PM -0700, Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy wrote:
> fixed. We (Bluetooth folks) have couple
> of devices that refuse to work with usb-uhci (I didn't test the latest
> usb-uhci though).
If that is the "device not accepting new address"-problem: This seems to be
a timing
Greg,
I'm gonna speak for Bluetooth USB devices.
I do have bunch of things like Kodak digi camera, Sony DV camcorder, CF
reader, etc. But they don't
seem to care much about which HCD is used and work equally well with both
usb-uhci and uhci drivers.
I used to be a uhci driver fan :). But start
21 matches
Mail list logo
