Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: devfs names

2001-10-29 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:34:32PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:20:37AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Well, devfs is still an option, and it is up to the

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: devfs names

2001-10-29 Thread lawson_whitney
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:20:37AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > > > > > > > Well, devfs is still an option, and it is up to the sytem administrator > > > > if it wants to use it, OTOH she had warts, and th

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: devfs names

2001-10-29 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:20:37AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > > > > > Well, devfs is still an option, and it is up to the sytem administrator > > > if it wants to use it, OTOH she had warts, and the distros have > > > effectively taken the rol

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: devfs names

2001-10-29 Thread Greg KH
> > On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > > > Well, devfs is still an option, and it is up to the sytem administrator > > if it wants to use it, OTOH she had warts, and the distros have > > effectively taken the role of system administrator. I think Mandrake > > at least has alrea

[linux-usb-devel] Re: devfs names

2001-10-29 Thread Michael H. Warfield
The linux-usb-devel list has been added to the Cc on this reply since it relates to USB naming conventions under DevFS... Consequently, I have trimmed very little of this message so that others on the USB list aren't lost wondering WTF... Richard Gooch has been added to t