On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 05:53:50PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > Well I asked Pat, and he said it was ok to use.
> >
> > I'd prefer that, as we would not have to grab yet-another-lock in the
> > probe sequence. Just document it well :)
>
> Here it is. This time locking and doing the operatio
> Well I asked Pat, and he said it was ok to use.
>
> I'd prefer that, as we would not have to grab yet-another-lock in the
> probe sequence. Just document it well :)
Here it is. This time locking and doing the operation is seperated.
Some firmware loaders need to do a reset during probe.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 06:30:49AM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 27. März 2003 01:54 schrieb Greg KH:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:02:43PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > this won't be quite to Greg's liking as it introduces holding another
> > > semaphore, but it
Am Donnerstag, 27. März 2003 01:54 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:02:43PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this won't be quite to Greg's liking as it introduces holding another
> > semaphore, but it is needed. You must not probe and reset at the same
> > time. This can bes
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:02:43PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this won't be quite to Greg's liking as it introduces holding another
> semaphore, but it is needed. You must not probe and reset at the same time.
> This can best be assured by the device's semaphore.
Why not just use the u
