Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 18. Juli 2002 23:45 schrieben Sie:
>
>>>is there a deeper reason for the TDs being allocated under a spinlock?
>>
>>The presence of an annoying hashtable needed for bus_to_virt()
>>style mappings. Minimally, stuffing the hashbuckets needs to
>>be reentrant,
Am Donnerstag, 18. Juli 2002 23:45 schrieben Sie:
> > is there a deeper reason for the TDs being allocated under a spinlock?
>
> The presence of an annoying hashtable needed for bus_to_virt()
> style mappings. Minimally, stuffing the hashbuckets needs to
> be reentrant, and that's done as part of
> is there a deeper reason for the TDs being allocated under a spinlock?
The presence of an annoying hashtable needed for bus_to_virt()
style mappings. Minimally, stuffing the hashbuckets needs to
be reentrant, and that's done as part of allocation.
After my next set of OHCI patches I hope to p
