Re: [linux-usb-devel] SOF sync and Gadget API

2006-10-26 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 26 October 2006 4:10 am, Armen Baloyan wrote: > >> This syncronization should be done in upper layer than PCD, i.e. in > >> gadget, > > > > That's not necessarily true, but gadget drivers should certainly be _able_ > > to do that synchronization. > > So as I understood device clock s

Re: [linux-usb-devel] SOF sync and Gadget API

2006-10-26 Thread Armen Baloyan
tion may be done in PCD? Does it mean that I need to implement such a synchronization routine in PCD? Thanks in advance, Armen Baloyan - Original Message - From: "David Brownell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cc: "Armen Baloyan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tu

Re: [linux-usb-devel] SOF sync and Gadget API

2006-10-24 Thread David Brownell
On Friday 20 October 2006 12:10 am, Armen Baloyan wrote: > Hi all, > > During my work on ISOC EPs support implementation for USB OTG driver I've > met some difficulties - as is written in usb 2.0 spec: > > 5.12.4.1.2 Synchronous > > Synchronous endpoints can have their clock system (their n

[linux-usb-devel] SOF sync and Gadget API

2006-10-20 Thread Armen Baloyan
Hi all, During my work on ISOC EPs support implementation for USB OTG driver I've met some difficulties - as is written in usb 2.0 spec: 5.12.4.1.2 Synchronous Synchronous endpoints can have their clock system (their notion of time) controlled externally through SOF synchronization. These end