On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 02:51:01PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > Q: Why did you remove the hook from the pwc driver?
> > A: It was there for the explicit purpose to support a binary only
> >module. That goes against the kernel's documented procedures, so
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Greg KH wrote:
> Q: Why did you remove the hook from the pwc driver?
> A: It was there for the explicit purpose to support a binary only
>module. That goes against the kernel's documented procedures, so I
>had to take it out.
Can you say exactly where these procedure
So, I've gotten a lot of emails about this topic, so I'll just answer
them all here in public, and point people at them when they ask them
again:
First off, here's Nemosoft's big post about the driver, please read that
first, and the responses to that thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.us
