[linux-usb-devel] UHCI losing data

2002-06-20 Thread Dan Streetman
Ok, I'm completely stumped on a problem and thought I'd see if anyone has seen this or might have an idea why it's happening. I (unfortunately) have to use an older kernel (2.4.2-2, i.e. Redhat 7.1) and on both UHCI drivers (uhci.o and usb-uhci.o) I'm seeing what looks like the HCD is losing

Re: [linux-usb-devel] UHCI losing data

2002-06-20 Thread Johannes Erdfelt
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002, Dan Streetman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I'm completely stumped on a problem and thought I'd see if anyone has seen this or might have an idea why it's happening. I (unfortunately) have to use an older kernel (2.4.2-2, i.e. Redhat 7.1) and on both UHCI drivers

Re: [linux-usb-devel] UHCI losing data

2002-06-20 Thread Johannes Erdfelt
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002, Dan Streetman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: Well, 2.4.2 is known buggy. Why do you have to use that? Can you just use the driver from a more recent kernel? Testing, support, and a binary module...so I'm stuck at 2.4.2-2. I

Re: [linux-usb-devel] UHCI losing data

2002-06-20 Thread Dan Streetman
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: Ok, I think you can probably backport the necessary fixes to get it to work. The PCI DMA stuff is pretty easy to seperate out logically from the other changes. I'll have to take a look at the diff. That'd be great! If you can point out which

Re: [linux-usb-devel] UHCI losing data

2002-06-20 Thread Johannes Erdfelt
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002, Dan Streetman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: Ok, I think you can probably backport the necessary fixes to get it to work. The PCI DMA stuff is pretty easy to seperate out logically from the other changes. I'll have to take

Re: [linux-usb-devel] UHCI losing data

2002-06-20 Thread Georg Acher
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 04:22:37PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: That'd be great! If you can point out which changes you suspect I'll try them out. I'm still suspicious though, since it's happening in both uhci and usb-uhci...I didn't think they shared queueing code...? Maybe it's something