On Tuesday 04 January 2005 7:43 pm, Alan Cox wrote:
> This I noticed in the docs: The support is for USB 1.0 not 1.1 OHCI 1.0
> for USB 1.0
All OHCI controllers I've seen are for "OHCI 1.0". :)
The spec I use says "OHCI 1.0a", it's not clear what changed
between the 1.0 and 1.0a versions. Proba
This I noticed in the docs: The support is for USB 1.0 not 1.1 OHCI 1.0
for USB 1.0
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- wel
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Maw, 2005-01-04 at 19:44, David Brownell wrote:
> > If 2.6.10 doesn't work, then it'd be worth sorting out
> > what the problem is. There's no fundamental reason that
> > old Socket7 chipset shouldn't work just fine with Linux.
>
> I've got a sis530 in the
On Maw, 2005-01-04 at 19:44, David Brownell wrote:
> If 2.6.10 doesn't work, then it'd be worth sorting out
> what the problem is. There's no fundamental reason that
> old Socket7 chipset shouldn't work just fine with Linux.
I've got a sis530 in the junk pile here if it can be usefully used. Also
On Monday 03 January 2005 10:57 pm, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
> I do not know if this is already a known problem. If it is not, I am
> hopeful that the owner might be willing to do some further testing. Me, I
> find it interesting that he says 2.4.27 works for him with his camera and
> his scanner, a
Greg and company,
As some of you probably know, I do the support for the sq905 cameras in
libgphoto2.
Just after Christmas, someone reported a new sq905 camera, saying that it
did not work. The log file showed the problem was that data sent from the
camera on the bulk pipe seems to get dropped:
