Re: [linux-usb-devel] cyberJack: Lazy INT INs?

2002-11-03 Thread Matthias Bruestle
Mahlzeit It does not work, when DEBUG is stayed defined in usb-uhci.c. It does work, when dbg is stayed defined in usb-uhci.c and all dbgs are commented out, thereby leaving only queue_dbg and async_dbg in effect. The outputs occuring in the kernel messages are (as examples): usb-uhci.c: process

Re: [linux-usb-devel] cyberJack: Lazy INT INs?

2002-11-03 Thread Matthias Bruestle
Mahlzeit On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 05:56:50PM +0100, Matthias Bruestle wrote: > When using these readers doing constant I/O there happen packet > shifts. On the last test run with about 60 commands this > happenend once. This doesn't look much, but it does really > interfere program execution.

[linux-usb-devel] cyberJack: Lazy INT INs?

2002-11-01 Thread Matthias Bruestle
Mahlzeit I'm currently test concurrent usage of multiple USB smart card readers, currently in a 32 device configuration. I'm doing my testing with 2.4.20-pre11 because of these kernels I tried out it is the best working one. The hostcontroller is UHCI and I am using usb-uhci. When using these re