[linux-usb-devel] direct

2004-04-16 Thread direct
      ACADEMIA WALL STREET FITNESS  Fone: 3335-7227 3291-6590 Clientes e funcionários das empresas abaixo. Pagam apenas R$ 58,00 para fazer ginástica e musculação todos os dias horários livres e R$ 70.00 para spinning, ginástica e musculação. TELEMIG CELULAR - TIM MAXITEL

[linux-usb-devel] direct

2004-04-15 Thread direct
      ACADEMIA WALL STREET FITNESS  Fone: 3335-7227 3291-6590 Clientes e funcionários das empresas abaixo. Pagam apenas R$ 58,00 para fazer ginástica e musculação todos os dias horários livres e R$ 70.00 para spinning, ginástica e musculação. TELEMIG CELULAR - TIM MAXITEL

[linux-usb-devel] direct

2004-03-30 Thread direct
      ACADEMIA WALL STREET FITNESS  Fone: 3335-7227 3291-6590 Clientes e funcionários das empresas abaixo. Pagam apenas R$ 58,00 para fazer ginástica e musculação todos os dias horários livres e R$ 70.00 para spinning, ginástica e musculação. TELEMIG CELULAR - TIM M

Re: [linux-usb-devel] direct the Linux console the USB port

2004-01-19 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 06:19:59PM -0800, Kent Ip wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I read your post in linux-kernel archive. > I am working on a target board running Linux with USB > only and without serial port. > I want to direct the Linux console the USB port, so > that i can remote control it on PC. Th

[linux-usb-devel] direct the Linux console the USB port

2004-01-17 Thread Kent Ip
Hi Greg, I read your post in linux-kernel archive. I am working on a target board running Linux with USB only and without serial port. I want to direct the Linux console the USB port, so that i can remote control it on PC. Now, i can send the shell output to PC side by running following command o

[linux-usb-devel] direct call of usb_scan_devices and locking

2001-07-01 Thread Oliver Neukum
Hi list, in usbserial.c there is a call to usb_scan_devices. The locking in this case is done in usb_find_interface_driver, but it is per driver and not per device. This means that a device could be probed simultaneously by two probe functions. I think this is not a good idea. Regards