On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, ashili wrote:
> I am able submit URBs for bulk out and bulk in
> endpoints for sending & recieving data from USB device
> (which is Net2280 for now); but I am seeing the
> following limitation. I know Net2280 sends me 5 data
> packets on bulk-in endpoint for every request I sub
I am able submit URBs for bulk out and bulk in
endpoints for sending & recieving data from USB device
(which is Net2280 for now); but I am seeing the
following limitation. I know Net2280 sends me 5 data
packets on bulk-in endpoint for every request I submit
on bulk out endpoint ; but I am able to r
HI Alan:
It helped; thanks much.
I notice there are 2 ioctls for reapurb (with and
without timeout).
-ashili
--- Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, ashili wrote:
>
> > I am using devio.c interface to talk to usb
> device. I
> > cannot make the SUBMIT_URB for bulk-i
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, ashili wrote:
> I am using devio.c interface to talk to usb device. I
> cannot make the SUBMIT_URB for bulk-in endpoint work.
> Here is what I am doing in my user space app.
> ---Open devnode, read descriptors, send ioctl for "set
> configuration", I get the return values 0 (s
I am using devio.c interface to talk to usb device. I
cannot make the SUBMIT_URB for bulk-in endpoint work.
Here is what I am doing in my user space app.
---Open devnode, read descriptors, send ioctl for "set
configuration", I get the return values 0 (success).
Set the realtime signal hander fo
Hello,
I'm trying to get the status of a USB Printer ( DELL 720C ) while
printing a multi-pages file.
I'd like to be able to detect the status "out-of-paper" when there are
anymore piece of papers in the printer or "off line" when the printer is
shutdown.
But I've always got the same status = 18 =>
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Brad Hards wrote:
> | On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:06, Ian Molton wrote:
> | > why do people hate IOCTLs ?
> | Different people hate them for different reasons. There is a lot to hate :)
> | 1. Some people don't like the lack of portabilit
Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 00:02 schrieb Greg Herlein:
> > > why do people hate IOCTLs ?
> >
> > Different people hate them for different reasons. There is a lot to hate
> > :)
>
> Question: the Linux Telephony API heavily uses ioctls to control
> the low level telephone behavior via the drive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:15, Ian Molton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:39:45 +1100
>
> Brad Hards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not the maintainer, but my opinion is that if you have to use
> > them, do so. If there is a better way, use that inste
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:39:45 +1100
Brad Hards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not the maintainer, but my opinion is that if you have to use
> them, do so. If there is a better way, use that instead.
If theres a better way to do ANYTHING do it instead.
--
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 23:02, Greg Herlein wrote:
> > > why do people hate IOCTLs ?
> > Different people hate them for different reasons. There is a lot to hate :)
>
> Question: the Linux Telephony API heavily uses ioctls to control
> the low level telephone behavior via the driver. Existing
> dr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:02, Greg Herlein wrote:
> > > why do people hate IOCTLs ?
> >
> > Different people hate them for different reasons. There is a lot to hate
> > :)
Note the smiley. I find ioctl's are good for some things - they are just easy
to a
> > why do people hate IOCTLs ?
> Different people hate them for different reasons. There is a lot to hate :)
Question: the Linux Telephony API heavily uses ioctls to control
the low level telephone behavior via the driver. Existing
drivers for PCI/ISA/PCMCIA all use this interface.
I am workin
13 matches
Mail list logo
