On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:08:16AM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > The clearing is needed only if a device is attached across the driver
> > reload, and if you cannot tolerate a command failure (most likely, an
> > open(2) would fail). If a device gets con
On Tue, 4 Oct 2005 15:34:23 -0400, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:08:16AM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > The clearing is needed only if a device is attached across the driver
> > reload, and if you cannot tolerate a command failure (most likely, an
> > open(2
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:08:16AM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> The clearing is needed only if a device is attached across the driver
> reload, and if you cannot tolerate a command failure (most likely, an
> open(2) would fail). If a device gets connected after the reload, it's
> all the same. I am
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 04:15:49 -0400, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 02:00:51PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > This code appears to be more trouble than it's worth, considering that
> > no normal users reload drivers. So, we comment it for now. It is not
> > removed
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 02:00:51PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> This code appears to be more trouble than it's worth, considering that
> no normal users reload drivers. So, we comment it for now. It is not
> removed outright for the benefit of hackers (that is, myself).
My scripts reload drivers d
This code appears to be more trouble than it's worth, considering that
no normal users reload drivers. So, we comment it for now. It is not
removed outright for the benefit of hackers (that is, myself).
Signed-off-by: Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.14-rc1-gregkh/drivers/block/ub.c
