(please keep me Cc'ed, I'm not subscribed to linux-usb-devel)
Hi,
it seems that recent kernels (I'm using the Fedora 2.6.11-1.1268_FC4
kernel which I believe is based off 2.6.12-rc3 and AFAIK it doesn't have
any invasive patches in that area) has changed behavior wrt hotplug
event ordering. In [
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, David Zeuthen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems that recent kernels (I'm using the Fedora 2.6.11-1.1268_FC4
> kernel which I believe is based off 2.6.12-rc3 and AFAIK it doesn't have
> any invasive patches in that area) has changed behavior wrt hotplug
> event ordering. In [1], I've
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 05:21:10PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> David's right. Why did kobject_hotplug() move out of kobject_add() and
> into its callers sometime after 2.6.11? In particular the invocation in
> device_add() is in the wrong place; it needs to come before
> bus_add_device() starts
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 04:14:08PM -0700, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 05:21:10PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > David's right. Why did kobject_hotplug() move out of kobject_add() and
> > into its callers sometime after 2.6.11? In particular the invocation in
> > device_ad
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 02:47:23AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 04:14:08PM -0700, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 05:21:10PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> >
> > > David's right. Why did kobject_hotplug() move out of kobject_add() and
> > > into its callers
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 04:14:08PM -0700, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 05:21:10PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > David's right. Why did kobject_hotplug() move out of kobject_add() and
> > into its callers sometime after 2.6.11? In particular the invocation in
> > device_ad
On Friday 29 April 2005 11:23 am, Roman Kagan wrote:
>
> ... instead of trying to make sure the attributes are available via
> sysfs at hotplug time, we can use another means to pass them to hotplug:
> we can add a routine, which, when called from the .hotplug function
> and given pointers to stru
Am Freitag, 29. April 2005 21:28 schrieb David Brownell:
> On Friday 29 April 2005 11:23 am, Roman Kagan wrote:
> >
> > ... instead of trying to make sure the attributes are available via
> > sysfs at hotplug time, we can use another means to pass them to hotplug:
> > we can add a routine, which,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 09:35:52PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Freitag, 29. April 2005 21:28 schrieb David Brownell:
> > On Friday 29 April 2005 11:23 am, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > >
> > > ... instead of trying to make sure the attributes are available via
> > > sysfs at hotplug time, we can use
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:23:36PM +0400, Roman Kagan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 04:14:08PM -0700, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 05:21:10PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> >
> > > David's right. Why did kobject_hotplug() move out of kobject_add() and
> > > into its callers
Am Freitag, 29. April 2005 22:01 schrieb Greg KH:
> > > I'd rather just guarantee that the sysfs device were fully
> > > constructed (attributes and all) before the driver binding and
> > > hotplug stages of enumeration started. That's been a problem
> > > all along, and that's what those recent c
On Friday 29 April 2005 12:35 pm, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Freitag, 29. April 2005 21:28 schrieb David Brownell:
> > On Friday 29 April 2005 11:23 am, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > >
> > > ... add environment variable ...
> >
> > Color me amused. That was the original way to pass information
> > to ho
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 22:16 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Freitag, 29. April 2005 22:01 schrieb Greg KH:
> > > > I'd rather just guarantee that the sysfs device were fully
> > > > constructed (attributes and all) before the driver binding and
> > > > hotplug stages of enumeration started. That'
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:28:30PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Friday 29 April 2005 11:23 am, Roman Kagan wrote:
> >
> > ... instead of trying to make sure the attributes are available via
> > sysfs at hotplug time, we can use another means to pass them to hotplug:
> > we can add a routine,
Hey,
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 21:34 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Greg, ok if I prepare a patch to look at or don't you like the split?
>
> Let's see what the patch looks like :)
>
Did anything happen on this issue? Is there a patch yet? :-)
Thanks,
Dave
-
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:19:41AM -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 21:34 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Greg, ok if I prepare a patch to look at or don't you like the split?
> >
> > Let's see what the patch looks like :)
>
> Did anything happen on this issue? Is ther
16 matches
Mail list logo
