I've observed poor receive performance in 100baseTx-FD mode from ax8817x
devices in all versions of usbnet.c. Half-duplex received performance
is actually better than full duplex. After some investigation, I found
that the MEDIUM_MODE wasn't being written, and this seems to affect
"Pause fram
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 14:07 -0700, Jamie Painter wrote:
> I've observed poor receive performance in 100baseTx-FD mode from ax8817x
> devices in all versions of usbnet.c. Half-duplex received performance
> is actually better than full duplex. After some investigation, I found
> that the MEDIUM_
David Hollis wrote:
The only issue that I see is that the usbnet_open() function (which
calls the ax8817x_reset) is only called when the interface is brought
from DOWN to UP state. If I initially connect to a 100FD switch, then
unplug and plug into a 10HD hub, things may get squirrely. If I bring
David Hollis wrote:
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 14:07 -0700, Jamie Painter wrote:
I've observed poor receive performance in 100baseTx-FD mode from ax8817x
devices in all versions of usbnet.c. Half-duplex received performance
is actually better than full duplex. After some investigati
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 14:54 -0700, Jamie Painter wrote:
>
> Here's a second try at the patch that fixes ax88172 receive
> performance in full duplex mode.
>
> Dealing with the async read/write_cmd calls looked to me to be messy,
> with four calls needed to read the link partner capabilities the
