RE: [linux-usb-devel] RE: Analyze the USB Control transfer limits Table please..

2006-03-01 Thread Mukund JB.
devel] RE: Analyze the USB Control transfer limits >Table please.. > >On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Mukund JB. wrote: > >> >In other words, since low-speed USB runs at 1.5 Mb/s, that's 150 >> bits >> >per second, or 1500 bits per frame, or 187.5 bytes per frame.

RE: [linux-usb-devel] RE: Analyze the USB Control transfer limits Table please..

2006-03-01 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Mukund JB. wrote: > >In other words, since low-speed USB runs at 1.5 Mb/s, that's 150 > bits > >per second, or 1500 bits per frame, or 187.5 bytes per frame. Since > you > >can't transfer half a byte, the number is rounded down to 187. > > I agree for low speed devices, t

RE: [linux-usb-devel] RE: Analyze the USB Control transfer limits Table please..

2006-02-28 Thread Mukund JB.
Dear Alan, Thanks for the response. >> >> I am not speaking about the 'Max Transfers' instead I am talking >> about >> >> the MAX bottom most row. I did not understand how is max bandwidth >> >> jumped to 187500 value. >> > >> >> >> I understand it suggests that it supports (187500*8) = 1.5Mb/s >>

Re: [linux-usb-devel] RE: Analyze the USB Control transfer limits Table please..

2006-02-28 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Mukund JB. wrote: > Dear Alan, > > >On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Mukund JB. wrote: > > > >> Dear Alan, > >> > >> I am not speaking about the 'Max Transfers' instead I am talking > about > >> the MAX bottom most row. I did not understand how is max bandwidth > >> jumped to 187500 valu