Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Regression in Some NVidia USB Controllers

2006-06-05 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 05 June 2006 1:57 pm, Paul Serice wrote: > I'm not sure why my email to and from the list is delayed, but I sent > a corrected patch to the list almost two days ago that hasn't been > posted yet. The reason for the correction is that I messed up my > merge with HEAD (as caught by Pete Za

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Regression in Some NVidia USB Controllers

2006-06-05 Thread David Brownell
On Saturday 03 June 2006 12:17 am, Paul Serice wrote: > The workaround in commit f7201c3dcd7799f2aa3d6ec427b194225360ecee > broke. The work around requires memory for DMA transfers for some > NVidia EHCI controllers to be below 2GB, but recent changes have > caused the DMA memory to be allocated b

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Regression in Some NVidia USB Controllers

2006-06-05 Thread Paul Serice
I'm not sure why my email to and from the list is delayed, but I sent a corrected patch to the list almost two days ago that hasn't been posted yet. The reason for the correction is that I messed up my merge with HEAD (as caught by Pete Zaitcev). I accidentally I had this in my patch: -

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Regression in Some NVidia USB Controllers

2006-06-05 Thread Paul Serice
> Wait a second, what about this part which you removed: Your absolutely right. I was working with 2.6.16.18 which didn't have that chunk of code, and I messed up the merge. I will resend the patch with the correction. Thanks, Paul ___ linux-usb-d

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Regression in Some NVidia USB Controllers

2006-06-05 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 02:17:48 -0500, Paul Serice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The workaround in commit f7201c3dcd7799f2aa3d6ec427b194225360ecee > broke. The work around requires memory for DMA transfers for some > NVidia EHCI controllers to be below 2GB, but recent changes have > caused the DMA me