On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 12:53:49PM -0500, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alan Stern wrote:
> > >
> > >>This could very easily be the bug where UHCI garbages the USB data
> > >>toggle when control queueing is in use ... it shouldn't be
On Saturday 17 January 2004 21:15, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, David Brownell wrote:
> > This could very easily be the bug where UHCI garbages the USB data
> > toggle when control queueing is in use ... it shouldn't be patching
> > the toggles after they're set up, that's only for queu
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan Stern wrote:
> >
> >>This could very easily be the bug where UHCI garbages the USB data
> >>toggle when control queueing is in use ... it shouldn't be patching
> >>the toggles after they're set up, that's only for queues of bul
Alan Stern wrote:
This could very easily be the bug where UHCI garbages the USB data
toggle when control queueing is in use ... it shouldn't be patching
the toggles after they're set up, that's only for queues of bulk
or interrupt transfers. I'm not sure what happened to the patch
which fixed tha
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, David Brownell wrote:
> This could very easily be the bug where UHCI garbages the USB data
> toggle when control queueing is in use ... it shouldn't be patching
> the toggles after they're set up, that's only for queues of bulk
> or interrupt transfers. I'm not sure what happ
Simone Gotti wrote:
Hi,
I've already wrote about this bug on the usb-user mailing list and on the
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1873
One bug is that for some reason the uhci-hcd driver is failing the
requests from "usbmodules". Unmounting "usbfs" prevents "usbmodules"
from running.
This c
