On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> What do you do if a second reset is requested while the first is in progress?
> Silently merge them?
It can't happen. A driver has to hold the usb_device's semaphore before
it can request a reset.
In fact, it would be a good idea to add a utility rou
Am Mittwoch, 18. Januar 2006 16:07 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>
> > The two-signal reset bothers me too, because it has to interact well
> > with actual disconnect, and generally I do not like this sort of thing.
>
> There is a potential problem with actual dis
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> The two-signal reset bothers me too, because it has to interact well
> with actual disconnect, and generally I do not like this sort of thing.
There is a potential problem with actual disconnect occurring in the
middle of a reset sequence. I think the o
Am Dienstag, 17. Januar 2006 21:54 schrieb Pete Zaitcev:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:34:33 +0100, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There's a certain danger of getting a reset followed by a secondary reset
> > as an error treatment, followed by ... Could you do a real disconnect in
> > t
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:34:33 +0100, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a certain danger of getting a reset followed by a secondary reset
> as an error treatment, followed by ... Could you do a real disconnect in
> theses cases?
The semantics of a disconnect are different, because
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > My idea is to add a new method to struct usb_driver, something like
> >
> > void(*reset_notify)(struct usb_interface *intf, int after);
> >
> > The core would call this routine for each interface before the reset with
> > after set to 0, and
Am Montag, 16. Januar 2006 17:21 schrieb Alan Stern:
> Well, it has happened at last, just as Oliver predicted. A user has a
> Western Digital USB disk drive with an extra HID interface tacked on, the
> drive encounters data transmission errors, and usb-storage skips doing a
> port reset becaus