> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:52:09AM -0500, Craig W. Nadler wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> >On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:11:11PM -0500, Craig W. Nadler wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>I've put together a patch demonstrating how Interface Association
>> >>Descriptors could be supported with a minimal amount
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:52:09AM -0500, Craig W. Nadler wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:11:11PM -0500, Craig W. Nadler wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I've put together a patch demonstrating how Interface Association
> >>Descriptors could be supported with a minimal amount of ch
Greg KH wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:11:11PM -0500, Craig W. Nadler wrote:
>
>
>>I've put together a patch demonstrating how Interface Association
>>Descriptors could be supported with a minimal amount of changes the
>>current USB stack. When a USB device is enumerated the descriptors
Alan Stern wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Craig W. Nadler wrote:
>
>
>
>>I've put together a patch demonstrating how Interface Association
>>Descriptors could be supported with a minimal amount of changes the
>>current USB stack. When a USB device is enumerated the descriptors are
>>parsed by
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:11:11PM -0500, Craig W. Nadler wrote:
> I've put together a patch demonstrating how Interface Association
> Descriptors could be supported with a minimal amount of changes the
> current USB stack. When a USB device is enumerated the descriptors are
> parsed by the cod
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Craig W. Nadler wrote:
> I've put together a patch demonstrating how Interface Association
> Descriptors could be supported with a minimal amount of changes the
> current USB stack. When a USB device is enumerated the descriptors are
> parsed by the code in drivers/usb/cor
