> Yes, although I sent a patch (that I'd been trying to get people to provide
> test feedback on for months - I never saw the problem occur on my test setup)
> to the l-u-devel mailing list that corrects this (a few days ago).
>
> Are you actually seeing problems? Can you test the patches?
I'v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 01:41, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> This code in cdc-ether.c, CDCEther_start_xmit()
> 2.5.x current but 2.4 seem wrong too:
>
> // If we are told to transmit an ethernet frame that fits EXACTLY
> // into an integer number of USB
Alan Stern wrote:
The byte in question should be set to
0 before it is transmitted. Second, if this is a matter of sending a runt
USB packet, why not make it a 0-length packet instead of a 1-byte packet?
Set to zero or any other constant value, yes. Not a very
high bandwidth cove
On 25 Mar 2003, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> This code in cdc-ether.c, CDCEther_start_xmit()
> 2.5.x current but 2.4 seem wrong too:
>
> // If we are told to transmit an ethernet frame that fits EXACTLY
> // into an integer number of USB packets, we force it to send one
> // more byte so the