Re: [linux-usb-devel] hiddev question

2005-06-09 Thread Johannes Berg
Jeff Lange wrote: Johannes, the device is fully HID compliant, it is just a vendor defined usage. The reason for this was to make Windows driver a lot easier to write. I think I'm just going to have to write my own kernel driver for this thing and create a char dev that my app can read the dat

Re: [linux-usb-devel] hiddev question

2005-06-08 Thread Jeff Lange
Ken, I too am writing a USB MSR =). Johannes, the device is fully HID compliant, it is just a vendor defined usage. The reason for this was to make Windows driver a lot easier to write. I think I'm just going to have to write my own kernel driver for this thing and create a char dev that my a

Re: [linux-usb-devel] hiddev question

2005-06-08 Thread Ken Cobler
Jeff Lange wrote: Hi all, I'm developing a simple USB device that reports itself as a HID device, and uses interrupt transfers to send about 250 bytes of data whenever an event occurs on the device. I've managed to communicate with it and get the data using libusb, but I've found that if the

Re: [linux-usb-devel] hiddev question

2005-06-08 Thread Johannes Berg
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 12:37 -0400, Jeff Lange wrote: > I'm developing a simple USB device that reports itself as a HID > device, and uses interrupt transfers to send about 250 bytes of data > whenever an event occurs on the device. Why do you do this as opposed to *not* identifying as a HID dev