Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage error handling does not work

2002-09-30 Thread Yuri Per
Alan Stern wrote: >>Are there any plans to backport usb-storage changes to kernel 2.4? >> >> >One URL is > http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/2571/475/9524582/ > > Here is an updated version of this patch for the case somebody else whants it. Yuri diff -u usb-2.5/driv

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage error handling does not work

2002-09-27 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Matthew Dharm wrote: > A backport is planned. But there is a good deal of work to do on the 2.5 > branch before we're ready to backport fully. > > Someone (Alan?) did a backport of a pretty good snapshot. I don't remember > the URL. > > Matt > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 02:0

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage error handling does not work

2002-09-27 Thread Matthew Dharm
A backport is planned. But there is a good deal of work to do on the 2.5 branch before we're ready to backport fully. Someone (Alan?) did a backport of a pretty good snapshot. I don't remember the URL. Matt On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 02:01:45PM +0400, Yuri Per wrote: > David Brownell wrote: > >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage error handling does not work

2002-09-27 Thread David Brownell
> After upgrading from clean 2.5.38 to version from Greg's BitKeeper > repository I havn't seen kernel hangs any more. Drive works without > problems. There are several failed requests in log which was correctly > aborted and retried. > > Are there any plans to backport usb-storage changes to

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage error handling does not work

2002-09-27 Thread Yuri Per
David Brownell wrote: > Err, this morning Yuri sent a trace on 2.5.38 which showed an INQUIRY > issue. > > Matthew Dharm wrote: > >> 2.5 fixes this -- we changed the SCSI layer INQUIRY logic to act more >> like >> windows. > This 255-byte INQUIRY came from user-mode program ioctl, it's not a k

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage error handling does not work

2002-09-26 Thread Matthew Dharm
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:51:34AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > The pattern of errors you are getting is similar to one I've seen before. > Some devices do not properly adhere to the standards, because the > designers only bother to test them under Windows. In particular, the > firmware in some dev

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage error handling does not work

2002-09-26 Thread David Brownell
>>> 1) If command_abort() is called by scsi subsytem, process deadlocks >>> on wait_for_completion(&(us->notify)) >> >> For this one, it'd be good to know if 2.5.latest does the same thing. > > 2.5.38 oopses on the last line if usb_stor_abort_transport (us->srb == > NULL). I attepted to fix it:

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage error handling does not work

2002-09-26 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Yuri Per wrote: > 2.5.38 oopses on the last line if usb_stor_abort_transport (us->srb == > NULL). I attepted to fix it: > > --- linux-2.5.38-orig/drivers/usb/storage/transport.cSun Sep 22 > 08:25:06 2002 > +++ linux-2.5.38/drivers/usb/storage/transport.cThu Sep 26 17:

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage error handling does not work

2002-09-26 Thread Yuri Per
David Brownell wrote: > Out of curiousity, which kind of support does your motherboard provide? > There's the south bridge (VT8235), or the standalone chip (VT6202). > > It might matter; the VT602 hasn't always worked for me in PCI cards > (due to what seem like PCI problems). The patches I sent

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage error handling does not work

2002-09-25 Thread David Brownell
Yuri Per wrote: > I have problems with USB 2.0 IDE adapter connected to USB 2.0 port on > VIA motherboard. > > I am using 2.4.20-pre7 with patches sent to this list David Brownell > (older version hangs after loading ehci-hcd). Out of curiousity, which kind of support does your motherboard pro