Greg --
Several IO Networks EdgePort users have requested the ability
to explicitly assign serial ports to USB serial devices, regardless
of the order the devices are plugged in.
For example, in a retail application with both an EdgePort 8 and an
EdgePort 4/s they want to be sure the USB serial po
Your message was refused by recipient's server filtering program.
Reason given was as follows:
Disallowed attach type
Reporting-MTA: dns; smtp8.libero.it
Received-from-MTA: dns; inwind.it (217.58.165.225)
Arrival-Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 16:44:18 +0200
Final-Recipient: rfc822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Act
On Sun, 9 May 2004, Heiko Rosemann wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> On Sun, 9 May 2004, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > Just so. For some reason, under 2.6 the modem is returning for most of
> > the queries the answer to the _previous_ query. This makes no sense to me
> > at all. It's not a simple matter of
On Mon, 10 May 2004, Papik Meli wrote:
> Hi, this is the first time I post to this list, so please excuse any
> mistake...
>
> Until kernel 2.6.3 there was a patch that permitted to use some USB
> whose first interface number is 1 instead of 0. But with kernel 2.6.5
> the patch didn't work anymo
On Sun, 9 May 2004, Fulko Hew wrote:
>
> So far I haven't put in any tracing information, but I have been playing
> with the latest Knoppix release that provides kernel 2.6.5
> And the hotplug works with it.
>
> So could it be a difference in initialization between kernel 2.6.5 and 2.6.6
> or co
Alan Stern replied:
> On Sun, 9 May 2004, Fulko Hew wrote:
> >
> > So far I haven't put in any tracing information, but I have been
playing
> > with the latest Knoppix release that provides kernel 2.6.5
> > And the hotplug works with it.
> >
> > So could it be a difference in initialization betw
Duncan:
I went ahead and created a patch to change all the places where devio.c
uses an interface index. Now it always uses just the interface number.
Does this look all right to you? I don't have a convenient way to test
it.
Alan Stern
= drivers/usb/core/devio.c 1.108 vs edited =
Jon Neal wrote:
I have made a first attempt at supporting big endian processors in the USB
gadget RNDIS driver. The attached file is a diff against the current bit
keeper version. I was able to successfully ping a Windows XP host from our
device, but not from the host to our device. I have no pa
Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 9 May 2004, Heiko Rosemann wrote:
But, if you get another SETUP request and just by bad luck the data
registers are still set up for an IN request with previous data, you easily
get the wrong data if you send the IN request before the controller can
handle the setup-token
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 03:15:35PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> uname -a
> Linux topalm2 2.6.6-rc2-bk2 #7 SMP Fri Apr 23 19:21:27 MSD 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Try using the -mm tree, this bug should be fixed there. If not, please
let us know.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message has been rejected because it has
a potentially e
This patch updates EHCI suspend/resume so that its essential
components work on a few different implementations:
- make root hub suspend/resume work
- make remote wakeup work (given CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND patch)
- separate root hub suspend/resume from PCI suspend/resume
- say if controller supp
I won't go through all the stuff about the PL(n), SL(n), and LL locks
because I think it's getting a bit confusing. Instead, let's consider
what operations can occur on a usb_device and which need to be mutually
exclusive.
Here's a list of operations that can apply to any device:
(1) Dis
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 08:15:15PM +1000, herbert wrote:
>
> The current code is applying the maxusage limit to GUSAGE/SUSAGE. This
> is incorrect as the number of values is stored in field->report_count,
> not field->maxusage. The USB phone from www.virbiage.com is one device
> where report_cou
Hi,
> I've been playing with the patches from
> http://www.bennee.com/~alex/software/kernel/index.php as well,
although
> nothing has been released by Arcom using it at this time it's likely
> this is what we will use for the next release.
That sounds interesting.
I downloaded them. I tried to c
David Brownell wrote:
>
> If you can ping in one direction but not the other, I'd suspect the
> issue is some sort of IP configuration issue on the Windows side.
> Can you do more than ping ... SSH, maybe?
>
I added debug statements in rndis_add_hdr and rndis_rm_hdr
to view the packet data. As
On Mon, 10 May 2004, Andreas Hocevar wrote:
> On Friday, May 07 2004, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 May 2004, Andreas Hocevar wrote:
> >
> > > Might this be a side-effect of the new routines checking for the "00 00 00
> > > ..." packets that the genesys chip produces? When using verbose mode in
Wat. 10 May 2004
Hello,
I have a usb device (www.validationtech.com) and i would like
to control it under linux but i dont have any experience in usb
driver programing. But if you help me a little i think i could
do it. How can i do that? The device is simple. Please give me
some help.
V I R U S A L E R T
Our viruschecker found a VIRUS in your email to "kosacoff".
We stopped delivery of this email!
Now it is on you to check your system for viruses
For further information about this viruschecker see:
http://amavis
On Sun, 9 May 2004, Zariel Skotlex wrote:
> Ah well... looks like I hit the end of the road for now. I tried kernel
> 2.6.6-rc3 (plus the two patches from this mailing list), and now I get a
> gazillion oopses from the kernel before I even hit the login prompt (the thing
> oopses so much I can't m
Hi,
Firstly, the bug report entry in FAQ is at least confusing. It says
"post to the right mailing list". But which mailing list is the right
one to post bugs?
My problem is that when ehci_hcd module is loaded, 30-40% of processor
time is spent in hard interrupt handlers ('hi' field in top). I've
On Mon, 10 May 2004, Bartosz Taudul wrote:
> Hi,
> Firstly, the bug report entry in FAQ is at least confusing. It says
> "post to the right mailing list". But which mailing list is the right
> one to post bugs?
Did you read the whole answer? It also says "You should send this
information to the u
Bartosz Taudul wrote:
My problem is that when ehci_hcd module is loaded, 30-40% of processor
time is spent in hard interrupt handlers ('hi' field in top). I've got
no usb 2.0 compliant devices connected.
That's odd. How are you getting "IRQ # 193" though? Looks
to me as if strange IRQ set up coul
On Friday, May 07 2004, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 6 May 2004, Andreas Hocevar wrote:
>
> > Since Kernel 2.6.4 the device hangs when burning CDs with cdrecord
or cdrdao
> > during sending the cue-sheet. The only case where this does not
happen is
> > when using tao mode for data CDs.
> >
> > Might
On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 01:46, Christoph Torens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, I am impressed by the many mails that came over the list.
> Many thanks for your help. (And sorry for my late answer)
>
> Ian Campbell wrote:
> > The VIPER kernel has the Roman Weissgaerber's 0.9.5 driver, I was never
>
uname -a
Linux topalm2 2.6.6-rc2-bk2 #7 SMP Fri Apr 23 19:21:27 MSD 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
part of dmesg output:
uhci_hcd :00:03.0: port 2 portsc 008a
hub 1-0:1.0: port 2, status 100, change 3, 12 Mb/s
usb 1-2: USB disconnect, address 16
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 18:11 +, Paulo Marques wrote:
> Anyway, this time I tested it using blocking and non-blocking I/O and it works
> for both cases. Even better, this patch only changes the behaviour for
> non-blocking I/O, and keeps the same behaviour for the more usual blocking I/O
> (at
$B!y13!&56$j$N$J$$:_Bp%o!<%/(B($BA[A|$H0c$$C/$b$,$S$C$/$j!*(B)$B!y(B
(B
$B(."""#(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,"#""(/(B
(B $B%[%C%H!&%[%C%H!&%K%e!<%9(B $B!c(B2004.05.09$BH/9T!d(B
$B(1"""#(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,"#""(0(B
(B
$B!Z"-
28 matches
Mail list logo
