Hello,
in 2.6.12-rc5 the problem is not present. All my USB-Storage Device works
with this kernel...
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Mittwoch, den 25. Mai 2005:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4291
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-25
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 4:40 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Dear usb developers, dear Andrew!
> >
> > I found that my builtin sd card reader connected via USB port
> > experiences several connect/reconnect cycles every time I boot.
> >
>
> Did we
On Saturday 21 May 2005 12:14 am, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 12:07:15AM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 May 2005 02:08:47 -0400, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > [...] It's not a correct fix, but due to time constraints
> > > (and paranoia) I'm opti
On Friday 27 May 2005 10:27 am, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2005, David Brownell wrote:
>
> > > > Actually I'm not so sure. I generally describe USB_SUSPEND as relating
> > > > to whether or not the USB "suspend" state is used ...
> > >
> > > Then how come the hub_suspend and hub_resume m
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 12:38 am, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> The itd_patch() function is responsible for allocating entries in the
> buffer page pointer list of the iTD. Particularly, a new page pointer
> is needed every time when buffer data crosses a page boundary.
>
> However, there is a bug in t
Hello,
While trying to write a linux driver for my USB device on kernel 2.4.30, I
noticed that doing an usb_unlink_urb on a bulk IN endpoint, and then
submitting a new urb later, causes the next packet of data on that
endpoint to be lost. I see the packet on my USB bus analyzer, but I don't
get t
Am Sonntag, 29. Mai 2005 07:31 schrieb Arlet Ottens:
>
> Hello,
>
> While trying to write a linux driver for my USB device on kernel 2.4.30, I
> noticed that doing an usb_unlink_urb on a bulk IN endpoint, and then
> submitting a new urb later, causes the next packet of data on that
> endpoint to
On Sun, 29 May 2005, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 29. Mai 2005 07:31 schrieb Arlet Ottens:
> >
> > While trying to write a linux driver for my USB device on kernel 2.4.30, I
> > noticed that doing an usb_unlink_urb on a bulk IN endpoint, and then
> > submitting a new urb later, causes the
