Re: [Linux-usb-users] nothing in /proc/bus/usb/ although usbdevfs mounted

2004-04-13 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Stephen J. Gowdy wrote: > time don't grep though, send the whole output. You proabbly don't have the > hardware enabled in your BIOS or it isn't getting an interupt line (but Going to the machine, I saw the AmiBios had "USB Function: Disabled". Thanks for the clue. I sure hop

Re: [Linux-usb-users] nothing in /proc/bus/usb/ although usbdevfs mounted

2004-04-13 Thread Stephen J. Gowdy
Hi Jeremy, You must have USB disabled in the BIOS for it not to show up on lspci. I'm assuming you do have USB ports that are connected to something regards, Stephen. On Tu

Re: [Linux-usb-users] nothing in /proc/bus/usb/ although usbdevfs mounted

2004-04-13 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Stephen J. Gowdy wrote: > I'd use modules. Actually looking over your earlier mail I now see it did > load them. However, it didn't find any hardware. Can you get lspci?, this > time don't grep though, send the whole output. You proabbly don't have the > hardware enabled in yo

Re: [Linux-usb-users] nothing in /proc/bus/usb/ although usbdevfs mounted

2004-04-13 Thread Stephen J. Gowdy
I'd use modules. Actually looking over your earlier mail I now see it did load them. However, it didn't find any hardware. Can you get lspci?, this time don't grep though, send the whole output. You proabbly don't have the hardware enabled in your BIOS or it isn't getting an interupt line (but for

Re: [Linux-usb-users] nothing in /proc/bus/usb/ although usbdevfs mounted

2004-04-13 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Stephen J. Gowdy wrote: > lsmod output. And "lspci -vvv | grep HCI" would be useful too. > > > Do you have a host controller loaded? lsmod should not help. I showed in my first email that my USB support used are not modular. (At least, I tried to show by showing my CONFIG_ s

Re: [Linux-usb-users] nothing in /proc/bus/usb/ although usbdevfs mounted

2004-04-13 Thread Stephen J. Gowdy
lsmod output. And "lspci -vvv | grep HCI" would be useful too. On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Stephen J. Gowdy wrote: > > > Do you have a host controller loaded? > > How can I check? > > What else can I show you? > >Jeremy C. Reed >http://bsd.reedmedia.n

Re: [Linux-usb-users] nothing in /proc/bus/usb/ although usbdevfs mounted

2004-04-13 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Stephen J. Gowdy wrote: > Do you have a host controller loaded? How can I check? What else can I show you? Jeremy C. Reed http://bsd.reedmedia.net/ --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free L

Re: [Linux-usb-users] nothing in /proc/bus/usb/ although usbdevfs mounted

2004-04-13 Thread Stephen J. Gowdy
Do you have a host controller loaded? On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > I really want to use gtkam (or gphoto2) to access a camera. > > But I don't seem to have any USB support. > > Here is what I have: > > -sh-2.05b# ls -l /proc/bus/usb/ > total 0 > > -sh-2.05b# uname -a > Linux mont

[Linux-usb-users] nothing in /proc/bus/usb/ although usbdevfs mounted

2004-04-13 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
I really want to use gtkam (or gphoto2) to access a camera. But I don't seem to have any USB support. Here is what I have: -sh-2.05b# ls -l /proc/bus/usb/ total 0 -sh-2.05b# uname -a Linux montecristo.reedmedia.net 2.6.3 #1 SMP Tue Apr 13 14:35:17 PDT 2004 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux -sh-2

Re: [Linux-usb-users] Reason for not running linux, try installing usb joystick

2004-04-13 Thread Tim Arney
tj, I know almost nothing about linux, but from my understanding uhci and ochi are interfaces for USB 1.1, and to get USB 2.0 speeds you need to use the ehci driver. Tim tj wrote: > Found a good reason to not run linux, installing a usb joystick has > turned into a two day ordeal and it still

Re: [Linux-usb-users] Re: [linux-usb-devel] Saitek success, what is difference between usb-uhci &uhci modules

2004-04-13 Thread David Brownell
tj wrote: If usb-uhci is not going to be 2.6, I guess the Saitek joy stick will not be supported in 2.6. Guessing is a bad idea. Try it on 2.6.5-mm, then see if it works; and report your results. Is this done just to totally confuse and bewilder poor souls like me? :-) Actually, the idea is that

Re: [Linux-usb-users] Re: [linux-usb-devel] Saitek success, what is difference between usb-uhci &uhci modules

2004-04-13 Thread tj
If usb-uhci is not going to be 2.6, I guess the Saitek joy stick will not be supported in 2.6. IHMO differences like this are what is causing Linux to have problems cracking the desktop Randy.Dunlap wrote: On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:45:47 -0400 tj wrote: | Well, I finally got the damn Saitek work

[Linux-usb-users] Re: [linux-usb-devel] Saitek success, what is difference between usb-uhci &uhci modules

2004-04-13 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:45:47 -0400 tj wrote: | Well, I finally got the damn Saitek working. In looking at module files | I noticed one called usb-uhci and loaded it instead of uhci and lo and | behold the damn Saitek worked. Good to hear it. | Now, hot plug originally loaded uhci, so kept loa

[Linux-usb-users] Saitek success, what is difference between usb-uhci &uhci modules

2004-04-13 Thread tj
Well, I finally got the damn Saitek working. In looking at module files I noticed one called usb-uhci and loaded it instead of uhci and lo and behold the damn Saitek worked. Now, hot plug originally loaded uhci, so kept loading it. So, my questions now are: What is the difference between usb-

Re: [Linux-usb-users] quickcam messenger

2004-04-13 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Thirza Berg wrote: >Does anyone of you know if there will be a driver available (soon?) for the >Logitech Quickcam Messenger? Or know if i can use one of the available >quickcam-drivers of other types? I don't think so. There has been several people mentioning that they are w