Either you don't have any partitions on memory key or system is not able
to find any valid partitions. Run fdisk /dev/sda and check whether your
device has any valid partitions.
Thanks
Brijesh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Stephen J. Gowd
It looks like you need to mount the entire device (as it doesn't have a
partition table). So "mount /dev/sda /mnt/flash". I still don't understand
the /dev files you are seeing, must be something I don't use.
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Ayman Asadi wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen
> Thank you for responding.
>
> He
Are you using devfs or something like that? I'm not use to the /dev/ you
point to below. What do you kernel logs show?
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Ayman Asadi wrote:
> Hi,
> I need assistance on mounting a vfat formatted usb flash device on an
> embedded linux (2.4.20 kernel on mips32 processor). I enabl
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Ayman Asadi wrote:
Hi,
I need assistance on mounting a vfat formatted usb flash device on an
embedded linux (2.4.20 kernel on mips32 processor). I enabled the scsi
support, vfat, fat, and msdos file systems, usb and usb-storage during
the kernel build. I can see that the devi
Hi,
I need assistance on mounting a vfat formatted usb flash device on an
embedded linux (2.4.20 kernel on mips32 processor). I enabled the scsi
support, vfat, fat, and msdos file systems, usb and usb-storage during
the kernel build. I can see that the device is being enumerated.
The system creat
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Chris Clayton wrote:
> > It would help if you included _all_ the kernel log messages in that file,
> > not just the debugging messages.
> >
> That's all there was in the log for this particular boot. I've never looked
> into
> it before, but it looks as if syslogging on my s
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Stefan Friedel wrote:
> Hi,
> since some versions of the 2.6.x kernels I have a problem w/ an usb stick.
> After googling around for "device not accepting address 4, error -71"-errors,
> disabling acpi, using old_scheme_first=0/1 etc. pp. and trying different
> 2.6.11.x-2.6.12.
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Robert Marquardt wrote:
> Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > That doesn't sound like a very good strategy in general. Configurations
> > don't have to be listed in any particular order; why should the first one
> > be treated specially?
>
> There are only two ways possible for prefer
On Monday 05 Sep 2005 17:33, Alan Stern wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions Alan. See below for my latest diagnostics, please.
> On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Chris Clayton wrote:
>
> > On Saturday 03 Sep 2005 19:17, Stephen J. Gowdy wrote:
> > > Make sure you have USB Legacy or a similar option off in your
Hi,
since some versions of the 2.6.x kernels I have a problem w/ an usb stick.
After googling around for "device not accepting address 4, error -71"-errors,
disabling acpi, using old_scheme_first=0/1 etc. pp. and trying different
2.6.11.x-2.6.12.x kernels I installed yesterday 2.6.13 w/
CONFIG_USB_
10 matches
Mail list logo
