Roger,
You do get the prize for the least imaginative names.
Your naming system is superior to the "elementary" suggestion from
Gareth, - no need to remember that periodic table.
Derek.
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Roger Searle wrote:
> But you don't get the prize for least imaginative perhaps. My
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:36:08 +1300, Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks, that would be great, it's just for a handy reference. Makes it
> easier to be able to look up a particular command, because at the moment
> my list of commands I know to use in my head is pretty small. Plus as i
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 16:30, Col wrote:
> I just updated my system, resulting in no modules autoloaded on bootup.
> It took down my network i/f, alsa, vid capture, usb
>
> It appears have changed the way hotplug works and now need coldplug to
> auto load modules on boot.
>
> #emerge coldplug
I just updated my system, resulting in no modules autoloaded on bootup.
It took down my network i/f, alsa, vid capture, usb
It appears have changed the way hotplug works and now need coldplug to
auto load modules on boot.
#emerge coldplug
#rc-update add coldplug boot
Col.
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 16:35, Matthew Gregan wrote:
> At 2004-11-11T16:26:25+1300, Nick Rout wrote:
> > the weird thing is that the ppp connection gets weird ip addresses
> > (192.168...)
> It's not weird, it's just from RFC1918 private address space.
> Unfortunately, some ISPs hand addresses from t
At 2004-11-12T15:23:53+1300, Matthew Gregan wrote:
> At 2004-11-12T14:54:47+1300, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > Is that a new feature that pppd can modify /etc/resolv.conf?
> It was introduced in pppd 2.3.9, which is circa August 1999.
...and it's actually writing to /etc/ppp/resolv.conf. It's left
At 2004-11-12T14:54:47+1300, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> Is that a new feature that pppd can modify /etc/resolv.conf?
It was introduced in pppd 2.3.9, which is circa August 1999.
> On SuSE this is handled by the ifup scripts, which first back up the
> existing resolv.conf and then write a new one ac
At 2004-11-12T14:51:21+1300, Andy Leach wrote:
> Modfy DNS when connected is not checked currently, when I select it it
> activates the two DNS boxes below. I don't have server IPs to enter
You need to make sure 'Automatically Retrieve DNS' is checked also,
otherwise you must supply the IP addres
> For a standard pppd(8), specifying 'usepeerdns' in your /etc/ppp/options
> file is the usual way to get pppd(8) to store the ISP-supplied DNS
> details into /etc/resolv.conf. There should be an easier way to ensure
> this happens via SuSE's graphical configuration utilities, though. I'm
> not f
How is the eth0 device configured? Manually, or using DHCP? DHCP will,
by default, overwrite your /etc/resolv.conf with the values it receives
from the DHCP server. This isn't happening in your case, but it's worth
noting as a possible issue for users with similar configurations.
DHCP, but t
At 2004-11-12T13:23:32+1300, Andy Leach wrote:
> As Chris and Matthew have asked me the same question pretty much, should
> I only respond to one to pull the thread together as I have here, or
> both? What is list etiquette for such situations?
Replying to only one is fine; the reason that you o
But you don't get the prize for least imaginative perhaps. My work
machines are one, two, three, four... At least it's a big name space!
Brendan Greer wrote:
Anyone with novel names they are willing to share???
Derek.
Ok how about ... localhost, ipcop, win98, win95 etc
hmm I know Im not to
thanks, that would be great, it's just for a handy reference. Makes it
easier to be able to look up a particular command, because at the moment
my list of commands I know to use in my head is pretty small. Plus as i
had to leave early I'm keen to have a look at what else you talked about.
For
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 13:23, Andy Leach wrote:
> As Chris and Matthew have asked me the same question pretty much, should
> I only respond to one to pull the thread together as I have here, or
> both? What is list etiquette for such situations?
I think it is probably better to pull them together
Anyone with novel names they are willing to share???
Derek.
Ok how about ... localhost, ipcop, win98, win95 etc
hmm I know Im not to creative
animated data-transfer
i'm only a suse newby, but i noticed when changing to dial on demand
(thanks nick) that the kinternet icon changes to this type of icon
when dial on demand is selected. are you sure that the connection has
dial on demand disabled?
cheers...howard
Volker said 'Keep that
As Chris and Matthew have asked me the same question pretty much, should
I only respond to one to pull the thread together as I have here, or
both? What is list etiquette for such situations?
Matthew Gregan wrote:
At 2004-11-12T11:54:53+1300, Andy Leach wrote:
OKAY!!! it dialed, I got a conne
Morning, hope you all had a good night -
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
previously, attempting to make the connection to a site was what
triggered the dailup request
Keep that "demand dial" box checked.
it is
[ftp]
no luck with these, time outs and name resolution failures
Hm, maybe the li
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:11, Andy Leach wrote:
> Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> >On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:30, Andy Leach wrote:
> >>Morning, hope you all had a good night -
> >
> >Yes, thank you for your concern.
> >
> >For some reason your connection to the isp has not given you a routeable
> > ip numbe
At 2004-11-12T11:54:53+1300, Andy Leach wrote:
> OKAY!!! it dialed, I got a connection, I heard the modem doing its
> thing. All 3 packets went and came back safely without loss in 278ms,
> 279ms and 278ms
Good news.
> the kinternet connection has now got two plugs, however, ping
> www.google.
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:30, Andy Leach wrote:
Morning, hope you all had a good night -
Yes, thank you for your concern.
For some reason your connection to the isp has not given you a routeable ip
number.
Is this machine connected to a LAN at the same time as it t
Matthew Gregan wrote:
At 2004-11-12T10:30:41+1300, Andy Leach wrote:
and ping -c3 google.com
ping: unknown host google.com
These failures all make sense based on the error you reported earlier
relating to /etc/resolv.conf.
When you're connected, can you try pinging www.google.com by
Sadly I have to admit... luke, leia, kenobi, vader, chewie.
However, by far the coolest naming system I've heard of (and one I
think mentioned briefly in the RFC Michael posted) is names of
elements.
This has the two advantages, besides having cool sounding names - the
name space is fairly big,
Andy Leach wrote:
Morning, hope you all had a good night -
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
previously, attempting to make the connection to a site was what
triggered the dailup request
Keep that "demand dial" box checked.
it is
[ftp]
no luck with these, time outs and name resolution failures
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:30, Andy Leach wrote:
> Morning, hope you all had a good night -
Yes, thank you for your concern.
For some reason your connection to the isp has not given you a routeable ip
number.
Is this machine connected to a LAN at the same time as it tries to connect to
the wider In
At 2004-11-12T10:30:41+1300, Andy Leach wrote:
> >and ping -c3 google.com
> ping: unknown host google.com
These failures all make sense based on the error you reported earlier
relating to /etc/resolv.conf.
When you're connected, can you try pinging www.google.com by one of its
IP addresses, e.g.:
You might like to consider the Intel Fortran Compiler.
There is a non-commercial release of it.
See:-
http://www.intel.com/software/products/noncom/
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 01:05, Wesley Parish wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:44, Richard Graham wrote:
> > I am a physics student at UoC.
> >
> > I don'
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 14:59, Roger Searle wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> Are the slides from your recent newbie presentation available somewhere?
>
> (sorry if I missed this if already posted).
>
> Cheers,
> Roger
no sorry, I haven't got round to doing that yet, thanks for reminding
me. i will try and p
Just a quick work of thanks to Jason for helping me to get my XF86config
going again. The MCC worked in the end. Also thanks to Paul for trying
to help.
Rowan
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:44, Richard Graham wrote:
> I am a physics student at UoC.
>
> I don't know anything about Fortran or OpenWatcom, but I can say that
> yes, their is still a lot of Fortran code being developed as well as
> maintained as we speak.
Well, I was thinking it'd be a very good way
I am a physics student at UoC.
I don't know anything about Fortran or OpenWatcom, but I can say that
yes, their is still a lot of Fortran code being developed as well as
maintained as we speak.
A friend of mine (an atmospheric physicist) is currently in the process
of learning Fortran, as it is o
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 20:47, Wesley Parish wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:58, Derek Smithies wrote:
> > Ok,
> > we can have a herd...
> >
> > ===
> > My work computer is called kauri.
> > a 3 1/2 year old machine, that has an athlon1333/512mb ram
> > which was big at the time...
> >
> >
> > then
> previously, attempting to make the connection to a site was what
> triggered the dailup request
Keep that "demand dial" box checked.
[ftp]
> no luck with these, time outs and name resolution failures
Hm, maybe the link is up but doesn't shove data across.
>setting /usr/bin/pppd to root:d
33 matches
Mail list logo
