On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:29, you wrote:
> On Friday 10 March 2006 18:41, Matthew Whiting wrote:
> > Kia ora all,
> >
> > Didn't manage to get to the Freenix workshop and am still keen to get
> > some help with getting my Lucent Agere modem working.
> > It still connects and then immediately or withi
On Friday 10 March 2006 18:41, Matthew Whiting wrote:
> Kia ora all,
>
> Didn't manage to get to the Freenix workshop and am still keen to get
> some help with getting my Lucent Agere modem working.
You need the LTmodem driver.
> I had another
> attempt the other day and still not getting anywher
Hmmm, decided on Maxnet as they had the cheapest setup deal. Then after
paying a month in advance + courier costs for the modem and getting sent
the modem, was told the lines were laid by Telstra and so, no go! Sent the
modem back, get a refund for costs, blah, blah, blah
Now, that restricts my op
Kia ora all,
Didn't manage to get to the Freenix workshop and am still keen to get some
help with getting my Lucent Agere modem working. I had another attempt the
other day and still not getting anywhere. Any chance someone at next
Tuesday's CLUG meet would be able to have a look at it for me? It
> Because if the "Microsofties" are cracked the result will be umpteen
> gigabytes of traffic which T/C will have to inevitably write off
Think of the positive effect that has on Redmond dominance ;)
And I don't think those Redmond customers are quite as innocent as you
make them out to be.
> A
On Fri Mar 10 11:22 , Alastair Sheppard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>I've talked with our printer guy, and unfortunatly he dosen't know of
>any printers that we can test this on. We have a Xerox C360 that we use,
>but I can talk straight to it with CUPS
...which is what I suggested 2 days ago.
(
On Fri, March 10, 2006 1:04 pm, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
>> Name a New Zealand corporation that is not screwing New Zealanders.
>
> Christchurch Red-Buses,
>
> --
> CS
>
That's not quite the opinion of the drivers I talk to! It was really
depressing when RB took over the 28 run from Leopard ( w
On Friday 10 March 2006 12:20, Andrew Errington wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:12, you wrote:
> > On Friday 10 March 2006 10:50, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > > *May* be nefarious, yes perhaps, *is* nefarious - no proof for that.
> > > Anyway, why are you so stubbornly concerned about a bunch of
> >
> > As long as there are plenty of distros around, and I expect there always
> > will be, the demise of any one hardly matters in the big picture.
> Putting your obvious bias aside
No bias there. I didn't even name a distro. Some ripples may be created
if any one of red hat, suse, debian disappea
On Fri, March 10, 2006 12:20 pm, Andrew Errington wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:12, you wrote:
>> On Friday 10 March 2006 10:50, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
>> > *May* be nefarious, yes perhaps, *is* nefarious - no proof for that.
>> > Anyway, why are you so stubbornly concerned about a bunch of
>> >
On Fri, March 10, 2006 11:00 am, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
>
> As long as there are plenty of distros around, and I expect there always
> will be, the demise of any one hardly matters in the big picture.
>
> Volker
>
> --
> Volker Kuhlmann is list0570 with the domain in header
>
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:12, you wrote:
> On Friday 10 March 2006 10:50, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > *May* be nefarious, yes perhaps, *is* nefarious - no proof for that.
> > Anyway, why are you so stubbornly concerned about a bunch of
> > Microsofties with a possibly open port?
>
> Two reasons.
> Any
On Friday 10 March 2006 10:50, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> *May* be nefarious, yes perhaps, *is* nefarious - no proof for that.
> Anyway, why are you so stubbornly concerned about a bunch of
> Microsofties with a possibly open port?
Two reasons.
Because if the "Microsofties" are cracked the result wi
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:16, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> Come on Paradise and TelstraClear!
> Why have you been dragging your feet on this issue?
> What's the problem?
>
> It's just not good enough you know, we pay a premium to have what was
> marketed as a secure and superior service, yet find our
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/09 5:35 p.m. >>>
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 17:19 +1300, Alastair Sheppard wrote:
> We have the same type of problem here at Lincoln with Mac's. Sorry
if
> you've mentioed this, but you mention a Novell network, so do you
print
> via a Netware server running pcounter or NDPS or
On 10/03/06, Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With unstable/bleeding edge being
> not really suitable for real deployment, does that leave anything Debian
> to recommend?
Ubuntu.
:-)
Cheers,
Carl.
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.announce/833
> It's a pretty
> damning mail, too.
Yes, esp reading between the lines: Debian stable didn't have a reliable
backporting of security fixes into the released+stable+current product,
apart from being very badly organised. With unstabl
> > After investigating this on your behalf I have discovered that the
> > packets come from our Customer Help modem interface which we use for
> > diagnostics and troubleshooting. I think that in the time that you
> > checked the packets, one of our technicians was pinging your internal IP
> > add
Hi.
Someone mentioned that they were using Amarok recently. I've just
started looking at it because XMMS is causing problems.
Is anyone able to tell me how to change the look of the butt ugly player
window? It's easy to change the look of the playlist and web interface,
but I can't for the li
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.announce/833
Martin Schulze quits as debian stable release manager. It's a pretty
damning mail, too.
--
Let us have a moment of silence for all Americans who are now stuck in
traffic on their way to a health club to ride a stationary bicycle. -
Co
On Friday 10 March 2006 00:27, Simon Knight wrote:
> I also requested Telstra look into the 172.20.18.55 port 67 issue I have
> logged similar packet counts with IPCOP 1.4.10 over the duration others
> here have seen i.e. the last few months at least and after 4 emails
> and 11 days with no respo
I also requested Telstra look into the 172.20.18.55 port 67 issue I have
logged similar packet counts with IPCOP 1.4.10 over the duration others here
have seen i.e. the last few months at least and after 4 emails and 11 days
with no response this is the reply I received today, it seems to be
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 20:53, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > See: www.tcn.bowenvale.co.nz
> >
> > Appologies in advance for the fact it's done in MS Power Point.
>
> Ouch, what a faux pas ;)
>
> However, if there was a pdf containing the slides, you might be
> forgiven.
Your wish is my command.
Th
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 20:37, Steve Holdoway wrote:
> freeradius/openldap authentication could be fun! Plug it into mail as well?
Sorry Steve, I don't understand what you're saying.
Cheers Don
Hi,
Bluewater Systems does a lot of Linux development on ARM-based platforms.
We are looking for someone to join the company to help with this. We are
a great company to work for - our staff tell us this all the time and if
they don't we withhold coffee. If you know anyone please let me know! We
25 matches
Mail list logo
