Got this sent to me ...
Pete
>Appears there's a workaround for the Verisign's .com/.net hijack
>spammer problem.
>
> http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/delegation-only.html
Tim Wright wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 15:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose that if enough Internet users DDOSED
asdj49
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 15:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I suppose that if enough Internet users DDOSED
> asdj49w8ucfosci8cfuserkctmwildfjksdfkg.com
>
> then verigsign may rethink its policies.
Alternatively, sign this petition:
http://www.petitiononline.com/icanndns/petition.html
--
Tim Wright
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 15:36, Carl Cerecke wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I suppose that if enough Internet users DDOSED
> > asdj49w8ucfosci8cfuserkctmwildfjksdfkg.com
>
> user wild.
>
> Was that on purpose, or just a random accident?
lol. My subconscious c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose that if enough Internet users DDOSED
asdj49w8ucfosci8cfuserkctmwildfjksdfkg.com
user wild.
Was that on purpose, or just a random accident?
Cheers,
Carl.
I suppose that if enough Internet users DDOSED
asdj49w8ucfosci8cfuserkctmwildfjksdfkg.com
then verigsign may rethink its policies.
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 13:19, Gareth Williams wrote:
> oh, WTF. That is just plain wrong. I didn't believe you until I tried it for
> myself :-/
> Nice article btw, t
oh, WTF. That is just plain wrong. I didn't believe you until I tried it for
myself :-/
Nice article btw, thanks for the link.
Cheers,
Gareth
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 12:31, Jim Cheetham wrote:
> FYI, I see in my DNS today that every possible .com and .net address now
> resolves, and goes
FYI, I see in my DNS today that every possible .com and .net address now
resolves, and goes to Verisign's portal site.
This has an impact on email - rejecting an incoming email message
because the claimed From address does now exist now fails, because all
.com and .net addresses exist.
(Naturally
