On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 12:55:38AM +1200, David Zanetti wrote:
> NAT does not what?
NAT does not work with all IP protocols.
> Which is the same effect in address overloaded NAT. There's no
> functional difference between the tables being maintained by
> connection tracking for a non-NAT connec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Matthew Gregan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 04:41:21PM +1200, David Zanetti wrote:
>
> > That depends on a lot of factors and exactly what you define as a
> > "packet filter" or a "firewall".
>
> Yes, and it depends what you
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:06:59PM +1200, wrote:
I cleverly sent a half-baked reply earlier thanks to my quick fingers.
> > A stateless packet filter will provide very little protection
> > against inbound data, due to it's lack of state awareness. In order
> > for a stateless filter to work, yo
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 04:41:21PM +1200, David Zanetti wrote:
> That depends on a lot of factors and exactly what you define as a
> "packet filter" or a "firewall".
Yes, and it depends what you define "NAT" as, too. Are we talking
source NAT, destination NAT, both src and dst NAT, port address
