Ah. It seems that Adobe doesn't consider security to be a high priority for
their Flash plug-in.
Douglas Royds wrote:
It isn't worse than cookies. I already maintain my cookies on a
white-list basis. What I've described means that I now maintain LSOs
that way as well.
Aidan Gauland wrote:
It isn't worse than cookies. I already maintain my cookies on a
white-list basis. What I've described means that I now maintain LSOs
that way as well.
Aidan Gauland wrote:
... how is this any worse than cookies?
Douglas Royds wrote:
Did you know that Adobe's Flash allows web-sites to store i
Hang on, don't panic! I'm pretty sure that each site is, by default, limited
to 100K. And anyway, how is this any worse than cookies? (Of course, I
should just shut up, since I refuse to use Flash, unless I absolutely HAVE to.) :)
Douglas Royds wrote:
Did you know that Adobe's Flash allows w
Did you know that Adobe's Flash allows web-sites to store information on
your local HDD? I didn't:
http://epic.org/privacy/cookies/flash.html
Here they are:
$ tree ~/.macromedia
/home/roydsd/.macromedia
`-- Flash_Player
|-- #SharedObjects
| `-- UED5REU8
| `-- s.ytimg.com
