Re: Fwd: Re: There Will be a CLUG - (was "There is no CLUG")

2003-01-31 Thread David A. Mann
Col wrote: > That would make it easy! I tried > > echo $4 > > but it displayed nothing (redhat 8) The script needs to be executable, and the first line needs to contain a path to the interpreter. Also I am not sure what it does with standard output so it may be a good idea to redirect that t

Re: Fwd: Re: There Will be a CLUG - (was "There is no CLUG")

2003-01-31 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Sat, 01 Feb 2003 15:14, Col wrote: > Christopher Sawtell wrote: > > On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:01, Col wrote: > >>Is there an easier/better way for a user to obtain ppp0 ip address than > >> > >>IP=$(netstat -rn | grep UH | cut -d" " -f1 | head -n 1) > > > > Quoting the pppd man page > > > > /etc/pp

Re: Fwd: Re: There Will be a CLUG - (was "There is no CLUG")

2003-01-31 Thread Col
Christopher Sawtell wrote: On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:01, Col wrote: Is there an easier/better way for a user to obtain ppp0 ip address than IP=$(netstat -rn | grep UH | cut -d" " -f1 | head -n 1) Quoting the pppd man page /etc/ppp/ip-up A program or script which is executed when

Re: Fwd: Re: There Will be a CLUG - (was "There is no CLUG")

2003-01-31 Thread Martin Baehr
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 04:19:11PM +1300, Michael JasonSmith wrote: > On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:12, Carl Cerecke wrote: > > Anybody have any Linux questions? > GNOME or KDE? what happened to: emacs or vi? greetings, martin. -- interested in doing pike programming, sTeam/caudium/pike/roxen trainin

Re: Fwd: Re: There Will be a CLUG - (was "There is no CLUG")

2003-01-30 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:01, Col wrote: > Is there an easier/better way for a user to obtain ppp0 ip address than > > IP=$(netstat -rn | grep UH | cut -d" " -f1 | head -n 1) Quoting the pppd man page /etc/ppp/ip-up A program or script which is executed when the link is

Re: Fwd: Re: There Will be a CLUG - (was "There is no CLUG")

2003-01-30 Thread Adrian Stacey
Col wrote: I have one ( trying to learn bash scripting ) Is there an easier/better way for a user to obtain ppp0 ip address than IP=$(netstat -rn | grep UH | cut -d" " -f1 | head -n 1) IP=$(netstat -rn | grep UH | awk '{print $1}') Adrian

Re: Fwd: Re: There Will be a CLUG - (was "There is no CLUG")

2003-01-30 Thread Col
Carl Cerecke wrote: Christopher Sawtell wrote: Personally, I have got neither the time nor the emotional energy to get involved with either a strictured, or a structured organisation. I'll just have to walk away from it if that happens. I hope not. Funnily enough, the 5 people "elected" to th

Re: Fwd: Re: There Will be a CLUG - (was "There is no CLUG")

2003-01-30 Thread C Falconer
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:29, Carl Cerecke wrote: > Michael JasonSmith wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:12, Carl Cerecke wrote: > > >Anybody have any Linux questions? > > GNOME or KDE? > For you, Michael, twm. socks:~# ps auxw | grep twm criggie 763 0.0 0.1 3228 1464 ?SJan30

Re: Fwd: Re: There Will be a CLUG - (was "There is no CLUG")

2003-01-30 Thread Carl Cerecke
Michael JasonSmith wrote: On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:12, Carl Cerecke wrote: Anybody have any Linux questions? GNOME or KDE? For you, Michael, twm. Cheers, Carl.

Re: Fwd: Re: There Will be a CLUG - (was "There is no CLUG")

2003-01-30 Thread Michael JasonSmith
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:12, Carl Cerecke wrote: > Anybody have any Linux questions? GNOME or KDE? :-P -- Michael JasonSmith http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/~mpj17/

Re: Fwd: Re: There Will be a CLUG - (was "There is no CLUG")

2003-01-30 Thread Carl Cerecke
Christopher Sawtell wrote: Personally, I have got neither the time nor the emotional energy to get involved with either a strictured, or a structured organisation. I'll just have to walk away from it if that happens. I hope not. Funnily enough, the 5 people "elected" to the committee probably h

Fwd: Re: There Will be a CLUG - (was "There is no CLUG")

2003-01-30 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 13:52, John S Veitch wrote: > Nick Elder : > "I MOVE THAT THE CLUG MEETING THIS COMING WEDNESDAY BE A GENERAL > MEETING AND THAT AT THIS MEETING WE FORM AN EXECUTIVE !" > > Christopher Sawtell: > "I second that!" While I did indeed write that, I want to make it perfectly clear