On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 1:13:16 pm Nick Rout wrote:
> If its a typical office printer/copier behemoth it will support a
> number of printing protocols, including smb (windows style), IPP (cups
> style), lpr (port 9100) style, but not all of them are always turned
> on and configured.
>
I believe that
print. ie I have a
> \\10.2.1.250\aficio3025 print device via the blue network, unable to
> resolve the IP address to name and have \\ricoh\aficio3025 as is the case on
> green. While it's perhaps only marginally a linux question, could I do
> something with the IPCop box to allow n
e
case on green. While it's perhaps only marginally a linux question,
could I do something with the IPCop box to allow name resolution to take
place between these subnets?
Thanks to everyone for getting me this far. If it goes no further, I'd
consider this solved enough.
Cheers,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Rout wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Steve Holdoway wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:25:25 +1200
Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
You need these open.
netbios-ns 137/tcp # NETBIOS Name Service
netbios-ns 137/udp
netbios-dgm 138/tcp # NETBIOS Datagram Service
netbios-dgm 138/udp
netbios-ssn 139/tcp # NETBIOS session service
netbios-s
Nick Rout wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steve Holdoway wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:25:25 +1200
Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want the wireless clients to be able to access the file share on the
green network and believe I
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Holdoway wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:25:25 +1200
>> Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I want the wireless clients to be able to access the file share on the
>> green network and believe I need to
Steve Holdoway wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:25:25 +1200
Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want the wireless clients to be able to access the file share on the
green network and believe I need to set up a DMZ pinhole - is that
correct? If so, what port(s) (or range) should I open?
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Steve Holdoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 2, you can set up what are effectively static ip addresses over dhcp
>> in ipcop, and you should probably do so, so that the windows box
>> always gets the right address to correspond wi
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:57:25 +1200
Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Steve Holdoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:25:25 +1200
> > Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, I
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Steve Holdoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:25:25 +1200
> Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi, I have IPCop set up with blue (10.3.1.0/24), green (10.2.1.0/24),
>> and red networks. Currently a
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:25:25 +1200
Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I have IPCop set up with blue (10.3.1.0/24), green (10.2.1.0/24),
> and red networks. Currently a wireless XP client on blue with a fixed
> DHCP lease is connected through a D-Link DSL-G604T
Hi, I have IPCop set up with blue (10.3.1.0/24), green (10.2.1.0/24),
and red networks. Currently a wireless XP client on blue with a fixed
DHCP lease is connected through a D-Link DSL-G604T wireless router
(10.3.1.1, doing DCHP relay to 10.3.1.2 - the IPCop blue NIC) and can
browse the
Just an update for anyone interested. I still haven't got this
working, but have a couple of areas I'm working on:
I think I need another fqdn on the linksys end. The manual for the
linksys says that each fqdn being used for authentication can only be
used once.
There is an ipcop sec
All the cables are okay, the device can be connected to by another one
the same.
In fact, that might be the issue.
There was some stuff in the log file that indicated that the other end
wasn't responding.
And I've found something in the linksys manual about not allowing two
vpns to be authentica
John Rye wrote:
And last gasp you have checked the cable haven't you
John
If you're going to ask that, then check if he's still got the box it
came in. ;)
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:45:18 +1200
Steve Holdoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the end point of the vpn is behind the router, is said router a) set up to
> allow for vpn passthrough, and b) forwarding udp/500 ( and sometimes tcp/500)
> traffic to the correct device?
>
And last gasp yo
vpn is provided by the linksys rv042. I've found the manual for
> that and found something under authentication, it says "the same IP
> and FQDN can be used only for one tunnel connection." This may be my
> problem as I was copying this info from another working connec
em as I was copying this info from another working connection.
> I'll need to do some more research on this.
>
> Or, am I wasting my time trying to get an IPCop vpn to talk to a
> linksys rv042 vpn?
>
>
Hard to say, but given the lack of really helpful responses you may be
be
nd the manual for
that and found something under authentication, it says "the same IP
and FQDN can be used only for one tunnel connection." This may be my
problem as I was copying this info from another working connection.
I'll need to do some more research on this.
Or, am I wasting my time trying to get an IPCop vpn to talk to a
linksys rv042 vpn?
On 9/5/07, Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, September 5, 2007 9:13 pm, Kerry Mayes wrote:
> > or, how does one debug a failing vpn connection?
> >
> > I'm trying to setup a vpn between an ipcop firewall and a linksys ag241..
> >
>
On 9/5/07, Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, September 5, 2007 9:13 pm, Kerry Mayes wrote:
> > or, how does one debug a failing vpn connection?
> >
> > I'm trying to setup a vpn between an ipcop firewall and a linksys ag241..
> >
>
On Wed, September 5, 2007 9:13 pm, Kerry Mayes wrote:
> or, how does one debug a failing vpn connection?
>
> I'm trying to setup a vpn between an ipcop firewall and a linksys ag241..
>
> As far as I can tell, I have set all the parameters correctly, but it
> will not esta
or, how does one debug a failing vpn connection?
I'm trying to setup a vpn between an ipcop firewall and a linksys ag241.
As far as I can tell, I have set all the parameters correctly, but it
will not establish a connection. On the linksys, I made a gateway to
gateway vpn entry and it
On 9/5/07, Kerry Mayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I used to use the add in "traffic control and reporting". (It allowed
> me to limit usage by ip address.) The other thing it did was
> summarise usage by ip address and send me an email each day - and,
> optionally, the user as well.
That's exac
ECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody know if it's possible to get a traffic report sorted by
> internal IP number out of an IPCop box? If so how?
>
> --
> Sincerely etc.
> Christopher Sawtell
>
just set up an iptable filter. Have a look at the scripts for my oncs
project.
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
Anybody know if it's possible to get a traffic report sorted by
internal IP number out of an IPCop box? If so how?
--
Don Gould
2/59 Peverel Street, Riccarton, Christchurch
Anybody know if it's possible to get a traffic report sorted by
internal IP number out of an IPCop box? If so how?
--
Sincerely etc.
Christopher Sawtell
I often use the updates page to test that ipcop has connectivity to
the internet. I hit the "refresh update list" button and wait until
the page reloads. If it comes up with a red border and appropriate
error message then I know not even the firewall has connectivity to
the inter
thanks for that, the box is new, so there are is nothing showing on the
box's updates page yet. and i'm new to ipcop so a bit of a learning
curve for me. i've subscribed to the ipcop-announce list.
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> On Friday 20 April 2007 09:36:33 Roger Searle wr
On Fri, April 20, 2007 9:36 am, Roger Searle wrote:
> Hi, I had been looking on the ipcop site for updates and there appear to
> be none. Is it simply that since 1.4.15 is the latest release that
> there are no updates yet? The faq on the site simply points to the home
> page, if th
On Friday 20 April 2007 09:36:33 Roger Searle wrote:
> Hi, I had been looking on the ipcop site for updates and there appear to
> be none. Is it simply that since 1.4.15 is the latest release that
> there are no updates yet?
Correct.
> The faq on the site simply points to the home
Hi, I had been looking on the ipcop site for updates and there appear to
be none. Is it simply that since 1.4.15 is the latest release that
there are no updates yet? The faq on the site simply points to the home
page, if there are some somewhere they are well hidden from me.
The ipcop box here
On both ocassions the experience was the same, working through the
various options to set up network configurations, cards, choose keyboard
and timezone etc. There is no "reinstallation" as such, it has to be a
"clean install". It was when viewing the dhcp options screen (which I
did not want to
On Thu, April 5, 2007 2:04 pm, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 13:49:21 Nick Rout wrote:
>> On Thu, April 5, 2007 1:39 pm, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
>> > Greeets CLUGgers,
>> >
>> > If one tries to access an IPCop from behind anothe
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 13:49:21 Nick Rout wrote:
> On Thu, April 5, 2007 1:39 pm, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > Greeets CLUGgers,
> >
> > If one tries to access an IPCop from behind another IPCop with the Squid
> > cache
> > turned on and in use by the browser you
On Thu, April 5, 2007 1:39 pm, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> Greeets CLUGgers,
>
> If one tries to access an IPCop from behind another IPCop with the Squid
> cache
> turned on and in use by the browser you get an access denied message from
> the
> cache. OTOH, if you set the
Greeets CLUGgers,
If one tries to access an IPCop from behind another IPCop with the Squid cache
turned on and in use by the browser you get an access denied message from the
cache. OTOH, if you set the browser to access the Internet directly, you are
allowed to access the remote IPCop&#
i recently installed 1.4.15 and was asked for three passwords (root
admin and backup). There was no way of missing it either. I wonder
if it was to do with *re*installing. Seems bizarre.
On 05/04/07, Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Looks like you didn't set the root password... may
Steve Holdoway wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:12:41 +1200
> Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> ok so on second installation i missed the option to set the passwords
>> yet again! so i booted into single user mode and changed the root
>> password, interestingly steve, this did not r
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:12:41 +1200
Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok so on second installation i missed the option to set the passwords
> yet again! so i booted into single user mode and changed the root
> password, interestingly steve, this did not require the root password!
> (physi
icated firewall box, I have ipcop
>> installed (1.4.15) and booting without keyboard, monitor etc, and
>> accessing via my browser. Yes, I'm reading plenty of documentation but
>> can't locate anything about the default password (assuming the user to
>> be root?).
&g
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 10:04:30 Roger Searle wrote:
> Hi, my first venture into a dedicated firewall box, I have ipcop
> installed (1.4.15) and booting without keyboard, monitor etc, and
> accessing via my browser. Yes, I'm reading plenty of documentation but
> can't loc
r Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi, my first venture into a dedicated firewall box, I have ipcop
>> installed (1.4.15) and booting without keyboard, monitor etc, and
>> accessing via my browser. Yes, I'm reading plenty of documentation but
>> c
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 10:04:30 +1200
Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, my first venture into a dedicated firewall box, I have ipcop
> installed (1.4.15) and booting without keyboard, monitor etc, and
> accessing via my browser. Yes, I'm reading plenty of docum
There isn't a default password, you set it at installation time. What
you need is the "admin" password, you can't log in remotely as root.
it will also have asked you for a "backup" password, I never use that.
If you've forgotten, you'll need to log in on
Hi, my first venture into a dedicated firewall box, I have ipcop
installed (1.4.15) and booting without keyboard, monitor etc, and
accessing via my browser. Yes, I'm reading plenty of documentation but
can't locate anything about the default password (assuming the user to
be root?).
I had real trouble with this upgrade. Luckily I was testing it on a
virtual machine before doing it on the live version.
The trouble was the /boot partition. For some reason this partition
is really small 8 or 10 Mb. (IPCop chooses the partition sizes, so it
creates this problem.) Anyway, it
On 06/02/07, Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to move to pfsense, but preventing the kids from blowing
> the download limit is too hard. I use an add on to IPCop that manages
> this with an easy to use GUI. I set up the limit by IP address and
>
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 12:10, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > These two updates are actually the ones I'm worried about - they say
> > they may not be compatible with add-ons.
>
> Me thinks he's staying with pfsense. No update version bla bla either:
> download config (1 file, xml), insert CD, boot
> I would like to move to pfsense, but preventing the kids from blowing
> the download limit is too hard. I use an add on to IPCop that manages
> this with an easy to use GUI. I set up the limit by IP address and
> when the limit is reached they have no more internet until the
No, I'm still with IPCop.
I would like to move to pfsense, but preventing the kids from blowing
the download limit is too hard. I use an add on to IPCop that manages
this with an easy to use GUI. I set up the limit by IP address and
when the limit is reached they have no more internet
> These two updates are actually the ones I'm worried about - they say
> they may not be compatible with add-ons.
Me thinks he's staying with pfsense. No update version bla bla either:
download config (1 file, xml), insert CD, boot, type about 5 keys, enter
LAN IP, upload config file. No questions
t;
> On 06/02/07, Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > thanks for the headsup by the way. so much for being on the ipcop-announce
> > mailing list!
> >
Watch out if you use the vpn addon!
uch for being on the ipcop-announce
mailing list!
Excellent, it's running 2.4.31 so the update to .11 should work. Thanks!
Kerry
On 06/02/07, Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 11:06, Kerry Mayes wrote:
> The instructions to install the upgrade to IPCop 1.4.11 state:
>
> You need to run ker
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 11:06, Kerry Mayes wrote:
> The instructions to install the upgrade to IPCop 1.4.11 state:
>
> You need to run kernel-2.4.31{,-smp} to apply the update.
>
> How do I do that? I note that one the boot options is labelled "smp",
> should I b
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 11:06, Kerry Mayes wrote:
> The instructions to install the upgrade to IPCop 1.4.11 state:
>
> You need to run kernel-2.4.31{,-smp} to apply the update.
Thats shortcut for MUST be 2.4.31 OPTIONALLY with smp
ssh into ipcop and check the version with uname -
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:06:41 +1300
Kerry Mayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The instructions to install the upgrade to IPCop 1.4.11 state:
>
> You need to run kernel-2.4.31{,-smp} to apply the update.
>
> How do I do that? I note that one the boot options is labelled &
The instructions to install the upgrade to IPCop 1.4.11 state:
You need to run kernel-2.4.31{,-smp} to apply the update.
How do I do that? I note that one the boot options is labelled "smp",
should I boot with that version of the kernel (and assume that it is
version 2.4.31)?
The
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:22:34 +1300
Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > cc use lartc's hbt. cc just present a wrapper.
>
> Tell me more about cc, please! What is it, what does it, how does it?
clarkconnect.org
one of those semi commercial jobs, with the premium versions costing mo
On Wed 10 Jan 2007 18:39:15 NZDT +1300, Don Gould wrote:
[...]
ipcop sucks when it comes to shaping. Look at pfsense instead, although
that doesn't do shaping per IP address either (but the reset of it is
very presentable).
On the +ve, look at the wondershaper package for Linux, which
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:39:15 +1300
Don Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > In particular this one:-
> > http://lartc.org
>
> See: http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=659667#r3
>
> cc use lartc's hbt. cc just present a wrapper.
>
> hbt isn't that h
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
In particular this one:-
http://lartc.org
See: http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=659667#r3
cc use lartc's hbt. cc just present a wrapper.
hbt isn't that hard to set up by the looks of things, cc makes it almost
idiot proof.
Cheers Don
--
Don G
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:24:15 +1300
Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 January 2007 13:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 10 January 2007 12:45, Don Gould wrote:
> > >> This one's for IPCop users out there, if you know t
Kerry Mayes wrote:
I'm not sure quite how you are wanting to manage bandwidth is it share
of "traffic" or share of the "speed"?
If it is share of traffic then the IPCop add in "Traffic Control and
Reporting" is what you want. It allows me to limit my ki
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 13:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 January 2007 12:45, Don Gould wrote:
> >> This one's for IPCop users out there, if you know this off the top
> >> of your head then a response would be helpful, please feel free
>
I'm not sure quite how you are wanting to manage bandwidth is it share
of "traffic" or share of the "speed"?
If it is share of traffic then the IPCop add in "Traffic Control and
Reporting" is what you want. It allows me to limit my kids to XMb per
month. (I
> On Wednesday 10 January 2007 12:45, Don Gould wrote:
>> This one's for IPCop users out there, if you know this off the top of
>> your head then a response would be helpful, please feel free not to
>> put any time into this :)
> 35 seconds
>
> http://www.google
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 12:45, Don Gould wrote:
> This one's for IPCop users out there, if you know this off the top of
> your head then a response would be helpful, please feel free not to
> put any time into this :)
35 seconds
http://www.google.com/search?q=IPCop+traffic+sh
This one's for IPCop users out there, if you know this off the top of
your head then a response would be helpful, please feel free not to put
any time into this :)
Clark Connect 3.2 has a bandwidth control ui.
It's nothing more than a wrapper for hbt.
Does anyone know if ipcop has
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:09, yuri wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to re-deploy an old IPCop box (PCI internal real-hardware
> modem) as a fax-server and answerphone.
>
>
> Anyone got any pointers on how to set this up?
>
> Thanks
> Yuri
If you can communicate with t
On 02/11/06, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Let us know your solution...
there's a few vgetty based voice-mail systems out there.
ETA for ADSL is 2006-11-25 (Saturday after Show Weekend) so I'll be
using the box for dial-up until then. Unfortunately I'm down to 28k
since a few weeks ago, so dial-up is
> I'd like to re-deploy an old IPCop box (PCI internal real-hardware
> modem) as a fax-server and answerphone.
> Anyone got any pointers on how to set this up?
Easy for that fax part - hylafax is the choice, somewhat American but
sendfax isn't very sophisticated. There's
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:09, you wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to re-deploy an old IPCop box (PCI internal real-hardware
> modem) as a fax-server and answerphone.
Try vocp
A
asterisk or hylafax
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:09:46 +1300
yuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to re-deploy an old IPCop box (PCI internal real-hardware
> modem) as a fax-server and answerphone.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # cat /proc/pci
>
On Thursday 02 November 2006 20:09, yuri wrote:
> Anyone got any pointers on how to set this up?
http://mgetty.greenie.net/
--
CS
Hi all,
I'd like to re-deploy an old IPCop box (PCI internal real-hardware
modem) as a fax-server and answerphone.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # cat /proc/pci
Bus 0, device 18, function 0:
Communication controller: Lucent Microelectronics Venus Modem
(V90, 56KFlex) (rev 0).
I
s tricks
to extract characters out of the noise.
[ ... ]
Alan: I have a very old '486 which is not in use. It's currently set up with
IPCop. I also have an ISA USRobotics modem which I could put in it. At the
moment both of these items are gathering dust. You could borrow them bot
Just received this and updated my ipcop. Absolutely painless.
Hardly noticed the reboot, and this email is proof its working.
Its not on all the sourceforge download sites, i had to go through a few
before I found it on the Minneapolis server:
http://umn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ipcop
> > easy way of
> > > > > telling which is which?
> > > > The MAC numbers.
> > ...or use 4 different cards (:
>
> If these cards are working you can always unplug one and look at syslog
> which will tell you which interface went down. :-)
In kernel 2.6 th
> From: Steve Holdoway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:41:29 +1200
> Kerry Mayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Of course, sorry for the silly question!
> >
> > On 21/08/06, Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Monday 21 August 2006 20:19, Kerry Mayes wrot
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:41:29 +1200
Kerry Mayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, sorry for the silly question!
>
> On 21/08/06, Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 21 August 2006 20:19, Kerry Mayes wrote:
> > > Also, all three 100Mb cards are the same, is there any
When installing ipcop I'm having difficulty getting the right
interfaces assigned to the right cards.
I had similar trouble with a mixture of ISA and PCI cards.
It seems to need something actually plugged into each card, else it
would automatically re-arrange the interfaces.
HTH
Col.
Of course, sorry for the silly question!
On 21/08/06, Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 21 August 2006 20:19, Kerry Mayes wrote:
> Also, all three 100Mb cards are the same, is there any easy way of
> telling which is which?
The MAC numbers.
On Monday 21 August 2006 20:19, Kerry Mayes wrote:
> Also, all three 100Mb cards are the same, is there any easy way of
> telling which is which?
The MAC numbers.
ifconfig eth1 on my machine says:-
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:24:AA:DA:45
inet addr:192.168.2.12 Bcast:192.1
Dear IPCop Gurus
When installing ipcop I'm having difficulty getting the right
interfaces assigned to the right cards. It defaulted the green
interface to the first card it found - the 10Mb card that should be
for the Blue - then is having difficulty finding all 3 100Mb cards.
Should
G I thought I'd sent this off list, sorry
Don Gould wrote:
Craig FALCONER wrote:
In fact I've probably got 50 spare 100 Mbit nics, so if anyone wants some
please reply off list.
Yes please... and sorry I haven't got those notes up on line you asked
for yet.
My LES kids are goi
@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: Re: IPCop, Smoothwall, m0n0wall etc (Was: OT WinME Firewall)
On Friday 11 August 2006 11:08 pm, Rik Tindall wrote:
..(modem)hardware+time / leccy / noise / deskspace costs all prohibit
this. (a small home office)
I saw headless IPCop boxes for sale at Molten Media fo
Craig FALCONER wrote:
In fact I've probably got 50 spare 100 Mbit nics, so if anyone wants some
please reply off list.
Yes please... and sorry I haven't got those notes up on line you asked
for yet.
My LES kids are going to be starting on routers shortly, so a bunch of
nics would be ver
Robert Fisher wrote re:
..(modem)hardware+time / leccy / noise / deskspace costs all prohibit
this. (a small [tiny] home office)
I saw headless IPCop boxes for sale at Molten Media for only $60.
For broadband / with modem?
It's a broken record, I'm sorry. On top of the extra clu
er [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 12 August 2006 8:28 a.m.
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: Re: IPCop, Smoothwall, m0n0wall etc (Was: OT WinME Firewall)
On Friday 11 August 2006 11:08 pm, Rik Tindall wrote:
> ..(modem)hardware+time / leccy / noise / deskspace costs all
On Friday 11 August 2006 11:08 pm, Rik Tindall wrote:
> ..(modem)hardware+time / leccy / noise / deskspace costs all prohibit
> this. (a small home office)
>
I saw headless IPCop boxes for sale at Molten Media for only $60.
One thing to keep in mind is that IPCop, Smoothwall etc aim to stop
naughty *inbound* connections, but will not prevent rogue software on
the WinME box from making *outbound* connections.
Running the last version of ZoneAlarm that still works on WinME,
That should be archived somewhere. Ta.
tog
st placing the WinME box behind a separate hardware firewall.
One thing to keep in mind is that IPCop, Smoothwall etc aim to stop
naughty *inbound* connections, but will not prevent rogue software on
the WinME box from making *outbound* connections.
Running the last version of ZoneAlarm that stil
On Thursday 27 April 2006 1:43 am, motivated wrote:
> Dramatic bak up !
>
> After reading the install instructions I wont be installing IPCop on my
> test box (Mandrake).
Forget the test box.
Simply download the iso using whatever OS you like then burn it to a CD.
Boot your IP
Taking this link:
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=40604
> what do I download to get ipcop installed on a stand alone box.
Assuming the "stand alone box" is running a standard Linux, issue the
command:-
wget \
http://superb-west.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ip
Taking this link:
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=40604
> what do I download to get ipcop installed on a stand alone box.
Assuming the "stand alone box" is running a standard Linux, issue the
command:-
wget \
http://superb-west.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforg
do I download to get ipcop installed on a
stand alone box.
Does it come with a GUI or do I need to install
something like Mandrake first ??
Thanks in advance
Regards Kelvyn
On 5 Mar 2006 at 11:33, Hadley Rich wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I remember a brief discussion on the list a while back about the Dynalink
> RTA-230 ADSL Modem/Router so thought someone may be doing this.
>
> At home I run an old Alcatel ADSL modem with IPCop behind it doing the PP
1 - 100 of 470 matches
Mail list logo
