Jim Cheetham wrote re:
Canterbury Linux, Unix and Gnu.
GNU is an acronym, not a Proper Noun.
Canterbury Linux Unix and GNU
GNU(ness / orientation / Project support / ..)
?
CLU(Bsd)G
On 25/04/07, Rik Tindall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Canterbury Linux, Unix and Gnu.
GNU is an acronym, not a Proper Noun.
Can Linux Understand Girls
- Original Message -
From: "Wesley Parish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: Last [fort]night and future meetings - BSD
On Monday 23 April 2007 11:57, Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
> Because we&#
Nick Rout wrote re:
"University of Canterbury Linux Users" list
This mailing list is simply known as CLUG and IMHO will continue to be.
The use of the word "linux" does not preclude interest in other similar
software. The lack of the term "GNU" does not imply antipathy for GNU or
Mr Stallman'
On Monday 23 April 2007 11:57, Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
> > Because we've already heard the copious angst over 'a' (merit-worthy or
> > otherwise), and given the 10/4/7 evidence, it seems we must opt (and so
> > I move) for 'b' - CUUG.
>
> I move that we retain the name CLUG, as it encompasses
Wesley Parish wrote:
On Monday 23 April 2007 11:57, Eliot Blennerhassett wrote re:
..it seems we must opt (and so I move) for 'b' - CUUG.
Canterbury Linux Users Group
Cantankerous Lovers of Unix Group
Curmudgeonly Learners Using Gnu
Courteous List Uniting Geeks
Continuous Loads of Unrelentin
On Mon, April 23, 2007 11:57 am, Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
> Continuous Loads of Unrelenting Garbage
> ...
Love it!
--
Nick Rout
Stick with CLUG and I thought it meant Clean Living Under Ground
- Original Message -
From: "Eliot Blennerhassett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: Last [fort]night and future meetings - BSD
Because we've already he
> Because we've already heard the copious angst over 'a' (merit-worthy or
> otherwise), and given the 10/4/7 evidence, it seems we must opt (and so
> I move) for 'b' - CUUG.
I move that we retain the name CLUG, as it encompasses enough possible
interpretations to keep most happy. Mix, match and
Well, the legacy proudly stands:
"Help! All these Linux emails are flooding my inbox.
... The best Header to filter on is probably "Comments: University
of Canterbury Linux Users Group" - which should appear in the header
of every email from the list."
http://clug.net.nz/index.php/Emai
Robert Fisher wrote:
What about..
.. a CLUG plug for a jug at a pub?
Sorry, poetry was never my forte.
Rob
D/Semi-seconded.
Amended proposal - for formal formation of the:
Canterbury Unix / BSD / GNU / Linux Users Group - CUBGLUG
Was worried about the connotation, but really it ide
Nick Rout wrote:
On Thu, April 19, 2007 4:43 pm, Carl Cerecke wrote:
grep ug$ /usr/share/dict/words
Ahhh good old Carl for bringing us back on topic.
But what do I do with "tautaug"
Eat it with chips, apparently [unless you're under the bridge with
Chris, and goats are in good su
On Thursday 19 April 2007 4:54 pm, Nick Rout wrote:
> Yes, i think we should have a poetry contest, each poem must contain the
> word clug at the end of a line, so we get some rhyming. (Although if its a
> haiku, it doesn't need to rhyme, so that rule wouldn't apply).
>
What about..
.. a C
I second that/then again ...
and Jim don't you laugh!!
Rik i believe would like to raise the importance of FOSS/GNU in CHCH and
further into NZ in a political and community way.
trouble is how to do this!
1 have a user group in chch with an acceptable name
To Rik's credit he has done
On Thu, April 19, 2007 4:43 pm, Carl Cerecke wrote:
>>grep ug$ /usr/share/dict/words
>
> Cheers,
> Carl.
>
Ahhh good old Carl for bringing us back on topic.
But what do I do with "tautaug"
--
Nick Rout
On Thu, April 19, 2007 4:35 pm, Christopher D Maher wrote:
> As an inpartial by stander I think CLUG is a cool name for this list.
> Just think of the cool words "CLUG" rhymes with:
> *chug
> *slug
> *bug
> *dug
> *Doug
> *jug(s).. ( ) ( )
>
> need I go on?
>
Yes, i think we should ha
grep ug$ /usr/share/dict/words
Cheers,
Carl.
On 19/04/07, Christopher D Maher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As an inpartial by stander I think CLUG is a cool name for this list.
Just think of the cool words "CLUG" rhymes with:
*chug
*slug
*bug
*dug
*Doug
*jug(s).. ( ) ( )
need I go o
As an inpartial by stander I think CLUG is a cool name for this list.
Just think of the cool words "CLUG" rhymes with:
*chug
*slug
*bug
*dug
*Doug
*jug(s).. ( ) ( )
need I go on?
On 18/04/07, Jim Cheetham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 18/04/07, Rik Tindall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Jim,
Jim Cheetham wrote:
On 18/04/07, Rik Tindall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The club built off the "University of Canterbury Linux Users" list
requires its own, fully appropriate, name.
I must admit that I don't see any need whatsoever to change the name
of the CLUG.
I haven't quit
On 19/04/07, Rik Tindall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nick Rout wrote:
> This mailing list is simply known as CLUG and IMHO will continue to be.
>
UCLU has allowed a "CLUG" to appropriate it, thus far, as per your lead,
as per Carl's cited documentation of events. For how long that lead can
be app
Ben Devine wrote:
Rik,
Seriously please shut the fXXX up.
Thanks,
Ben Devine
No way, now.
Much as your accelerating *nix adulthood is noted, the potty-training -
for some apparent reason - is incomplete..
--
Rik
Just to fix a typo.
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:38:24 +1200, Ben Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rik,
> Seriously please shut up.
> Thanks,
> Ben Devine
Sorry if my potty-mouth offended anyone.
Thanks,
Ben Devine
Rik,
Seriously please shut the fuck up.
Thanks,
Ben Devine
Nick Rout wrote:
On Wed, April 18, 2007 3:30 pm, Rik Tindall wrote:
The club built off the "University of Canterbury Linux Users" list
requires its own, fully appropriate, name. The "CLU" group is wider than
the initiator, including more diverse O/S community, so owes both a step
closer to in
On 19/04/07, Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, April 19, 2007 9:00 am, Chris wrote:
> Is CLUG so big that it needs to be divided?
Unfortunately that is Rik's modus operandi.
Can't we agree that while Rik isn't going to cause CLUG to change, he
has the *right* to want to cause CLUG t
On Thu, April 19, 2007 9:00 am, Chris wrote:
> WTF?
>
> Is CLUG so big that it needs to be divided?
Unfortunately that is Rik's modus operandi.
--
Nick Rout
WTF?
Is CLUG so big that it needs to be divided?
Forgive me if i'm wrong, but as one single *nix group, numbers are not huge,
and this limits activity as is.
I could be wrong, i'm only going by what i read here, as i am yet to get my
act together and show up at a meeting myself!
Surely there
On 18/04/07, Rik Tindall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The club built off the "University of Canterbury Linux Users" list
requires its own, fully appropriate, name.
I must admit that I don't see any need whatsoever to change the name
of the CLUG. However, if the group agrees that it should change
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Wednesday 18 April 2007 16:00:14 Carl Cerecke wrote:
What does GNU stand for again?
I forget too. Isn't it something like Ghastly Newbie Unix or some such.
Yep. That's the definition we needed, for what locks the staticOSS
problem in - an obvious exclusive att
Hi. Thanks for the reference Carl. Will consider it further for the
complete reply. In the meantime,..
Carl Cerecke wrote:
On 18/04/07, Rik Tindall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The club built off the "University of Canterbury Linux Users" list
requires its own, fully appropriate, name.
For som
On Wednesday 18 April 2007 4:00 pm, Carl Cerecke wrote:
> On 18/04/07, Rik Tindall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The club built off the "University of Canterbury Linux Users" list
> > requires its own, fully appropriate, name.
>
I consider myself part of a GROUP of LINUX USERS in CANTERBURY so CLU
On Wednesday 18 April 2007 16:00:14 Carl Cerecke wrote:
> What does GNU stand for again?
I forget too. Isn't it something like Ghastly Newbie Unix or some such.
--
CS
On Wed, April 18, 2007 4:00 pm, Carl Cerecke wrote:
> On 18/04/07, Rik Tindall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The club built off the "University of Canterbury Linux Users" list
>> requires its own, fully appropriate, name.
>
> For some history,
Interesting you should mention history. It reminds me
On 18/04/07, Rik Tindall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The club built off the "University of Canterbury Linux Users" list
requires its own, fully appropriate, name.
For some history, see my post nearly three years ago. FYI the
"InfoHelp" user is Rik.
http://lists.ethernal.org/oldarchives/cantlug-0
On Wed, April 18, 2007 3:30 pm, Rik Tindall wrote:
> The club built off the "University of Canterbury Linux Users" list
> requires its own, fully appropriate, name. The "CLU" group is wider than
> the initiator, including more diverse O/S community, so owes both a step
> closer to integrity, by r
Rik Tindall wrote:
>
> Thus, since our tradition is so strong on genetic divergence, and
> survival of the fittest (thru fork & contest), can we now consider this:
>
> The club built off the "University of Canterbury Linux Users" list
> requires its own, fully appropriate, name. The "CLU" group is
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
On Thu 15 Feb 2007 00:46:01 NZDT +1300, Rik Tindall wrote:
Seems to me, if you really want to teach GNU/Linux,
Then I would teach how to use software, and Linux software that would
be. Later on I would mention the open source model but not excessively.
In any case I wou
37 matches
Mail list logo
