> > As long as there are plenty of distros around, and I expect there always
> > will be, the demise of any one hardly matters in the big picture.
> Putting your obvious bias aside
No bias there. I didn't even name a distro. Some ripples may be created
if any one of red hat, suse, debian disappea
On Fri, March 10, 2006 11:00 am, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
>
> As long as there are plenty of distros around, and I expect there always
> will be, the demise of any one hardly matters in the big picture.
>
> Volker
>
> --
> Volker Kuhlmann is list0570 with the domain in header
>
On 10/03/06, Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With unstable/bleeding edge being
> not really suitable for real deployment, does that leave anything Debian
> to recommend?
Ubuntu.
:-)
Cheers,
Carl.
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.announce/833
> It's a pretty
> damning mail, too.
Yes, esp reading between the lines: Debian stable didn't have a reliable
backporting of security fixes into the released+stable+current product,
apart from being very badly organised. With unstabl
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.announce/833
Martin Schulze quits as debian stable release manager. It's a pretty
damning mail, too.
--
Let us have a moment of silence for all Americans who are now stuck in
traffic on their way to a health club to ride a stationary bicycle. -
Co
