On Mon 12 Nov 2007 17:47:21 NZDT +1300, John Carter wrote:
> Personally, given the very small and fluctuating IT job market in
> Canterbury, I
> am in favour employers and employees posting appropriate Job ad / Job
> requests on this list.
I agree. We've had far more noice than I expect from tha
It doesn't happen for the Canterbury Software Cluster, even though an HR
consultant tried it for a while, he gave up years ago. I don't really think
there is enough local work out there for it to ever become a problem ):
Steve
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:59:24 +1300
Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTE
On 12/11/2007, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> In principle I have no problems.
[snip]
> I don't fancy having to wade through dozens of either type of posting.
[snip]
> Difficult to know how to draw the line.
Let's tolerate for now and monitor the situation. If Christopher's
worst fears come true we
In principle I have no problems.
However I am somewhat apprehensive that, by your definition of the
AUP, the list could become both a 'Tenderers Gazette' for small jobs,
and also a haven for H.R. consultants trying to locate operators who
could use products such as Open Office. Frankly, I don't fa
Given the new anti-spam laws I thought it might be Good to clear this
up properly.
Personally, given the very small and fluctuating IT job market in Canterbury, I
am in favour employers and employees posting appropriate Job ad / Job
requests on this list.
By Appropriate I mean Very Strictly "Job
