Indeed, long may Mr Dagg and Trev reign
Chris
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 15:45 +1300, dave wrote:
> >
> > This is certainly top of my list, for it's ease as well as the No.8 wire
> Remember Steve this is a major requirement :-) ^^
> your in NZ now and not matter how much the beauodic
>
> This is certainly top of my list, for it's ease as well as the No.8 wire
Remember Steve this is a major requirement :-) ^^
your in NZ now and not matter how much the beauodicks in local/nat govt wish
to kill it we're much better off with the old No.8 mentality than without
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:54:54 +1300
Euan Clark wrote:
>
> Go simple.
>
> I had to span 15m using CAT5. Ran fencing wire between two eye hooks
> screwed under each eve to support CAT5.
> Cable ties to attach CAT5 to wire, make a 'U' at each end to make sure
> that rain can't run inside the hous
Go simple.
I had to span 15m using CAT5. Ran fencing wire between two eye hooks
screwed under each eve to support CAT5.
Cable ties to attach CAT5 to wire, make a 'U' at each end to make sure
that rain can't run inside the house and leave a little slack.
15 minutes, Gb throughput. If you make i
On Sat 14 Feb 2009 08:37:30 NZDT +1300, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> There is still the option of an optical link such as:-
> http://www.laser2laser.co.nz/about_laser.htm
Not bad, but sounds expensive.
> Those particular units are probably overkill for what you want to do,
> but is indicative of
On Saturday 14 February 2009 07:56:36 Steve wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:14:36 +1300
>
> yuri wrote:
> > 2009/2/13 Steve Holdoway wrote:
> > > That's what I'd heard as well. It's to network the gottage - or should
> > > I say goffice? - which I've thrown up a bit of ordinary cat5 for the
> > >
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:14:36 +1300
yuri wrote:
> 2009/2/13 Steve Holdoway wrote:
> > That's what I'd heard as well. It's to network the gottage - or should I say
> > goffice? - which I've thrown up a bit of ordinary cat5 for the moment, which
> > won't last the winter. With those data rates, I mi
2009/2/13 Steve Holdoway wrote:
> That's what I'd heard as well. It's to network the gottage - or should I say
> goffice? - which I've thrown up a bit of ordinary cat5 for the moment, which
> won't last the winter. With those data rates, I might as well put in a
> wireless
> bridge - much cheaper,
Hi Craig,
Good to know you are still out there with the LR.
Cheers Chris Thomas
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 09:54 +1300, Craig Falconer wrote:
> Steve Holdoway wrote, On 13/02/09 09:15:
> > That's what I'd heard as well. It's to network the gottage - or should I
> > say goffice? - which
> I've thrown u
Steve Holdoway wrote, On 13/02/09 09:15:
That's what I'd heard as well. It's to network the gottage - or should I say
goffice? - which
I've thrown up a bit of ordinary cat5 for the moment, which won't last
the winter. With those data
rates, I might as well put in a wireless bridge - much cheap
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:07:02 +1300
Craig Falconer wrote:
> Steve Holdoway wrote, On 12/02/09 18:16:
> > I'm looking at a Dynalink setup that suggests data rates of up to
> > 85mbit/sec. Has anyone any hard
> > experience on how good they actually are??
>
> Not actual experience no. I research
Steve Holdoway wrote, On 12/02/09 18:16:
I'm looking at a Dynalink setup that suggests data rates of up to 85mbit/sec.
Has anyone any hard
> experience on how good they actually are??
Not actual experience no. I researched it for someone though.
They are more likely to get ~15 Mbit not 85 Mb
I'm looking at a Dynalink setup that suggests data rates of up to 85mbit/sec.
Has anyone any hard experience on how good they actually are??
Linux to linux, I hasten to add!
Cheers,
Steve
--
Steve Holdoway
13 matches
Mail list logo
