> I am struggling to find a post where he was really flamed or anyone was
He sure as hell flamed me offlist twice, till I set up a filter to block
all mail from him.
CF wrote:
>
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 12:30, Adrian Stacey wrote:
My point is - which was worse? his OT question, or the way he asked it?
Compare "Can someone send me a copy of /usr/bin/pico - I deleted mine by
mistake" to "My machine is broken - fix it for me" to "I broke my
machine -...details... -
tion he got from some of the list memebers.
>
> Lance B
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:55:14 +1200
> To: Linux Users Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Response to OT posts (Re: wordpad.exe for W982E
list memebers.
Lance B
-Original Message-
From: CF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:55:14 +1200
To: Linux Users Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Response to OT posts (Re: wordpad.exe for W982E)
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 12:30, Adrian Stacey wrote:
> Carl Cer
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 12:30, Adrian Stacey wrote:
> Carl Cerecke wrote:
> > Sure, the guy is in trouble, but I'd rather not see questions like that
> > here. The list has quite a number of people now (> 250 I think). I am
> > concerned (a bit paranoid perhaps?) that if we allow these sorts of
> > i
Carl Cerecke wrote:
John Ascroft wrote:
Isn't that a bit precious. The guy's in trouble, most of the list seem to
run a copy of windows for one readon or another, get over it.
Sure, the guy is in trouble, but I'd rather not see questions like that
here. The list has quite a number of people now
John Ascroft wrote:
Isn't that a bit precious. The guy's in trouble, most of the list seem to
run a copy of windows for one readon or another, get over it.
Sure, the guy is in trouble, but I'd rather not see questions like that
here. The list has quite a number of people now (> 250 I think). I am
c