Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
i believe this is because the DVD i have is only 32bit, looking at the
folders within I don't see anything that obviously points to it being
both 32 and 64 bit - how can i tell with this?
For the 9GB dual-layer 32/64bit DVD from the retail box:
ls -l suse/
> i believe this is because the DVD i have is only 32bit, looking at the
> folders within I don't see anything that obviously points to it being
> both 32 and 64 bit - how can i tell with this?
For the 9GB dual-layer 32/64bit DVD from the retail box:
> ls -l suse/
total 1230
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root roo
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
running the 32bit version of suse.
What a waste.
where can i look to tell for sure?
uname -a
to give you the details of the running kernel
/etc/SuSE-release to tell you which system you have installed (X86-64
for 64bit).
ok th
So what advantage is there in running Server as opposed to Player?
Regards
Reg
-Original Message-
From: Steve Holdoway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 24 August 2006 1:50 p.m.
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: Re: Vmware Player & PC-BSD
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:4
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:01:37 +1200
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > Would I be correct in guessing that a dual core processor would handle this
> > type of setup really well compared to a non dual cored one?
>
> Yes. Even if an application can't use both processors at once, you can
> run two of those
> ummm maybe not so similar. while it's an athlon 64, i believe i'm
> running the 32bit version of suse.
What a waste.
> where can i look to tell for sure?
uname -a
to give you the details of the running kernel
/etc/SuSE-release to tell you which system you have installed (X86-64
for 64bi
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:42:15 +1200
Reg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Would I be correct in guessing that a dual core processor would handle this
> type of setup really well compared to a non dual cored one?
>
> Regards
> Reg
>
Does player support dual cores? Server certainly does, and, seeing
@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: Re: Vmware Player & PC-BSD
top shows memory usage at 28% - I allocate 512mb to the xp machine. cpu
usage of vmware is typically 1 - 3% at times like now when i'm using the
host machine and nothing is going on in the guest (not a problem).
start an application in the guest ma
ummm maybe not so similar. while it's an athlon 64, i believe i'm
running the 32bit version of suse.
where can i look to tell for sure?
video is nvidia onboard, happy to say no clock issues for me on host or
guest machines. resolving your issue steve would be well beyond me if
you and the
gt;> it twice as slow or just so small it matters little on a modern machine?
>>
>> Regards
>> Reg
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Col [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 23 August 2006 7:16 p.m.
>> To: linux-users@it.cante
So how do you start a new thread? I thought I had started a new thread by
having a new subject line ?
-Original Message-
From: Barry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 August 2006 11:05 p.m.
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: Re: Vmware Player & PC-BSD
Hi
Ah, got you, sorry about that, folks, we live and learn every day :-)
Regards Reg
Original Message-
From: Nick Rout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 24 August 2006 8:35 a.m.
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: Re: Vmware Player & PC-BSD
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:2
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:28:44 +1200
Reg wrote:
> So how do you start a new thread? I thought I had started a new thread by
> having a new subject line ?
That is a common misconception.
If you reply to an existing message, but change the subject line your
message will still have in its headers s
> From: Barry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 August 2006 11:05 p.m.
> To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
> Subject: Re: Vmware Player & PC-BSD
>
> Hi Reg,
>
> this posting of yours has no relevance to the thread. Please - new
> subject requires a new
Hi Reg,
this posting of yours has no relevance to the thread. Please - new
subject requires a new thread so do not send as a reply. to something else
Barry
Reg wrote:
I hope this is not too off topic. (If it is can someone please point me to a
good place to find answers for my below question
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:14:45 +1200
Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running vmware server on suse on my work machine - athlon64 with
> 2gig of ram. We have a couple of "windows only" applications that there
Just to slightly hijack this, as it's similar to my setup. I'm running vmwar
slow or just so small it matters little on a modern machine?
>
> Regards
> Reg
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Col [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 August 2006 7:16 p.m.
> To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
> Subject: Re: Vmware Player & PC-BSD
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 6:27 pm, Reg wrote:
> My second question: Is there likely to be any performance difference
> between running PC-BSD in VMware Player under XP and say just doing a
> regular dual boot system of PC-BSD and XP?
Yes there will be a performance difference.
>
> I am reluctan
Player & PC-BSD
Hi Reg
(I'm using a Linux host so hopefully it's the same.)
To enter a virtual machine either click on it or CTRL-G.
To exit a Virtual machine CTRL-ALT.
And yes there is a performance loss.
Col.
ice Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 August 2006 6:54 p.m.
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: RE: Vmware Player & PC-BSD
Hi,
Your new fast machine - what os does it normally boot with - pc-bsd I hope?
You install vmplayer for pc-bsd and run windozes where it belongs
Reg wrote:
I hope this is not too off topic. (If it is can someone please point me to a
good place to find answers for my below questions) - I have been
browsing the web for ages and can't find my answers.
PC-BSD continues to run fine on my Celeron 466. I am still in awe of its
stability.
.
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: Vmware Player & PC-BSD
I hope this is not too off topic. (If it is can someone please point me to a
good place to find answers for my below questions) - I have been
browsing the web for ages and can't find my answers.
PC-BSD continues to
I hope this is not too off topic. (If it is can someone please point me to a
good place to find answers for my below questions) - I have been
browsing the web for ages and can't find my answers.
PC-BSD continues to run fine on my Celeron 466. I am still in awe of its
stability. Just for kicks
23 matches
Mail list logo
