Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With latex it's very different, because there is a little markup to a
> lot of content (and tables are a PITA). The programming can be left
> out, or left for later.
simple tables aren't too painful, as far as mark-up in plain text goes
you can't ask
Steve Bell wrote:
Michael JasonSmith wrote:
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 10:52, Douglas Royds wrote:
Any recommendations?
Yes: don't use a "WYSIWYG" editor for a non-WYSIWYG medium.
Hwha? Maybe I haven't followed the thread closely enough, but Mr
Blogg's web is not WYSIWYG?
Calling the we
Okay, don't all jump on me about that one below! I posted it like over
a day ago, and it's only just flippin showed up now, when the thread's
developed somewhat!!!
"Frikkin x-tra, Mr Bigglesworth"
Yes: don't use a "WYSIWYG" editor for a non-WYSIWYG medium.
Hwha? Maybe I haven't follow
Michael JasonSmith wrote:
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 10:52, Douglas Royds wrote:
Any recommendations?
Yes: don't use a "WYSIWYG" editor for a non-WYSIWYG medium.
Hwha? Maybe I haven't followed the thread closely enough, but Mr
Blogg's web is not WYSIWYG?
On Thu, October 14, 2004 3:43 pm, Volker Kuhlmann said:
>> Yes: don't use a "WYSIWYG" editor for a non-WYSIWYG medium.
>
> Sorry, but I don't think I can agree. If I design something, I want to
> concentrate on the design and content, not on all this gaaawdamm
> syntax. It's not my job to keep al
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
For a site of non-trivial size you really should look into one of the
so-called 'content management systems' such as Plone.
I agree 100%. Some years ago, I built and maintained a largish site
using DreamWeaver only, and I really don't want another T-shirt. Much
can
they are
created with nVu and they are W3C html 4.01 compatible - so there!
Regards, Robert
-Original Message-
From: Volker Kuhlmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2004 3:44 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: WYSIWYG HTML editor?
> Yes: do
Nvu works very well on both Windows and Linux
Regards, Robert
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Sawtell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2004 11:19 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: WYSIWYG HTML editor?
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:52, Douglas
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 10:52, Douglas Royds wrote:
> Any recommendations?
Yes: don't use a "WYSIWYG" editor for a non-WYSIWYG medium.
--
Michael JasonSmith http://www.ldots.org/
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:52, Douglas Royds wrote:
> Any recommendations?
Sir Tim's very own one:-
http://www.w3.org/Amaya/
The Mozilla one, dissected out and much improved:-
http://www.nvu.com/
This one is _almost_ WYSIWYG and very highly regarded.
http://quanta.sourceforge.net/
For a site of non-
http://www.nvu.com/
Regards, Robert
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Royds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2004 10:53 a.m.
To: CLUG
Subject:WYSIWYG HTML editor?
Any recommendations?
Any recommendations that also have Windows builds available
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Douglas Royds wrote:
Any recommendations?
Any recommendations that also have Windows builds available?
Mozilla composer. Comes along all as part of the Mozilla package.
===
This email, including any attachments
Any recommendations?
Any recommendations that also have Windows builds available?
===
This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended
addressee. It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be
the subject of
13 matches
Mail list logo
