Re: Xstuff - nearly there

2004-12-30 Thread Nick Rout
On Fri, December 31, 2004 12:13 pm, Rob Wood said: > Thanks to Chris, Nick, Matthew, Steve, David and Glyn, > > OK a bit more progress. Further adjusting > xf86config has got background, > cursor and bash$ prompt up the whole time. > > The SecurityProfile is still being ignored and I still can't fi

Re: Xstuff - nearly there

2004-12-30 Thread Rob Wood
Thanks to Chris, Nick, Matthew, Steve, David and Glyn, OK a bit more progress. Further adjusting xf86config has got background, cursor and bash$ prompt up the whole time. The SecurityProfile is still being ignored and I still can't find the X log. I'm reasonably sure now that it does not exist on t

Re: Xstuff - nearly there

2004-12-29 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:11, rob wrote: > Thanks to Chris, Ross, Steve and Nick. > > I still haven't managed to locate an X log after several attempts. Oh well, I suppose it being written to /dev/null or something. Very helpfulNOT I must say. > After running xf86config again and adjusting the horizo

Re: Xstuff - nearly there

2004-12-29 Thread rob
Thanks to Chris, Ross, Steve and Nick. I still haven't managed to locate an X log after several attempts. After running xf86config again and adjusting the horizontal and vertical frequencies, if I move the mouse about whilst doing startx, the background and cursor will stay on screen. There is a

Re: Xstuff - nearly there

2004-12-29 Thread Matthew Gregan
At 2004-12-30T12:24:22+1300, Steve Holdoway wrote: > find / -name \*X\*log\* | xargs ls -ld You should really use -print0 for find and and -0 for xargs if they're available on your platform. Unfortunately, they are GNU/vendor extensions, so you can't assume they're always available. $ find / -n

Re: Xstuff - nearly there

2004-12-29 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Thu, December 30, 2004 11:45 am, Christopher Sawtell said: > On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:24, Rob Wood wrote: [snip] > Let's try and find it then. Unless I'm very much mistaken it must be > somewhere. Try these two commands which might take a few minutes on an > older > machine, please be patient:- >

Re: Xstuff - nearly there

2004-12-29 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:24, Rob Wood wrote: > Hi Chris, > Well good and bad news. With the downloaded SecurityPolicy file in place > startx starts up and the background stays on screen for about 2 seconds now > (100% improvement). There is no error message at the end of the run > regarding the Secur

Re: Xstuff - nearly there

2004-12-29 Thread Rob Wood
Hi Chris, Well good and bad news. With the downloaded SecurityPolicy file in place startx starts up and the background stays on screen for about 2 seconds now (100% improvement). There is no error message at the end of the run regarding the SecurityPolicy file so the file is clearly being found OK

Re: Xstuff - nearly there

2004-12-29 Thread Nick Rout
On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 20:12 +1300, rob wrote: > Hi Nick, > Yes I understand your thinking but there are good reasons behind all > this. Whilst it's true that I don't have lots of cash around at present > I did have a 486, a bit of spare time and a desire to get to grips with > Linux. The distro was

Re: Xstuff - nearly there

2004-12-29 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 20:12, rob wrote: > I hope this helps to explain my strange choices. I have no trouble at all understanding your motivation. Real world experience is worth many times that of 'certification'. anyway create the missing directory:- mkdir -p /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/ and copy

Re: Xstuff - nearly there

2004-12-28 Thread rob
Hi Nick, Yes I understand your thinking but there are good reasons behind all this. Whilst it's true that I don't have lots of cash around at present I did have a 486, a bit of spare time and a desire to get to grips with Linux. The distro was carefully selected as one which would run on the hardwa

Re: Xstuff - nearly there

2004-12-28 Thread Nick Rout
On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 18:12 +1300, Rob Wood wrote: > > Ah! there we are: XF86_VGA16 and the ( symbolic ) link called X, which > > points > > to it are both supposed to be in the directory /usr/X11R6/bin > > which in turn is supposed to be in the PATH. > > > > -- > > Sincerely etc., > > Christopher

Re: Xstuff - nearly there

2004-12-28 Thread Rob Wood
Ah! there we are: XF86_VGA16 and the ( symbolic ) link called X, which points to it are both supposed to be in the directory /usr/X11R6/bin which in turn is supposed to be in the PATH. -- Sincerely etc., Christopher Sawtell Yes that was the problem, brilliant! Startx now seems to start. I feel that