On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:17, you wrote:
> > I paid good money for TUMONZ (www.tumonz.co.nz). It was *totally*
> > worth it. It runs under Windows, and is derived from LINZ data.
>
> Yeah, I told them I'd buy it as soon as they had a Linux version, 'cause
> the doze one wasn't any good for me. Alway
> I paid good money for TUMONZ (www.tumonz.co.nz). It was *totally* worth
> it. It runs under Windows, and is derived from LINZ data.
Yeah, I told them I'd buy it as soon as they had a Linux version, 'cause
the doze one wasn't any good for me. Always register demand...
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlm
In the same place is now Canterbury.png however its 9.1 Mb
Should be what you need.
-Original Message-
From: Craig FALCONER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 18 August 2005 3:15 p.m.
To: linux-users@it.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: RE: wireless maps
Well actually no.
I've
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 18 August 2005 9:58 a.m.
To: CLUG
Subject: wireless maps
Hey Craig,
Now I'm up and running wireless ( 200mW + 15dbi external aerial! ) I'd like
to extend your wireless map over the water, but can't find any decent
pictures to overlay. It made me laugh wh
Look under Microsoft Patent applications (:
On Thu, August 18, 2005 2:43 pm, Andrew Errington said:
>> So we need to bond 2.4 and 2.6GHz together, and Beckham's your answer?
>>
>> Tricky thing's going to be getting it so the longer wavelength is at the
>> top.
>
> Yeah, that'll do it. However, no
> So we need to bond 2.4 and 2.6GHz together, and Beckham's your answer?
>
> Tricky thing's going to be getting it so the longer wavelength is at the
> top.
Yeah, that'll do it. However, no mention of successful application of this
technique can be found in the literature.
A
On Thu, August 18, 2005 2:20 pm, Andrew Errington said:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:59, you wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:51:20 +1200
>>
>> Andrew Errington wrote:
[snip]
> Profile looks like this:
>
>
> A
> \
> \/\
>B / \
> \/\
> \ / \
>
Thanks for that. It looks like we're about 4km apart then, Nick. Sould be
pretty easy as long as we don't need to tunnel (:
Steve
On Thu, August 18, 2005 1:35 pm, Stephen Irons said:
> What sort of maps do you want?
>
> Ecan has aerial photographs of much (all?) of Canterbury available
> online;
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:59, you wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:51:20 +1200
>
> Andrew Errington wrote:
> > > I can do line-of-sight height profiles from anywhere to anywhere.
> > > Give me an address Steve (off list) (already got yours Nick).
> >
> > Looks like there is a big hill in the way. It'
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:51:20 +1200
Andrew Errington wrote:
> >
> > I can do line-of-sight height profiles from anywhere to anywhere. Give
> > me an address Steve (off list) (already got yours Nick).
>
> Looks like there is a big hill in the way. It's the hill above Randolph
> Terrace.
>
> A
>
> I can do line-of-sight height profiles from anywhere to anywhere. Give
> me an address Steve (off list) (already got yours Nick).
Looks like there is a big hill in the way. It's the hill above Randolph
Terrace.
A
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:35, you wrote:
> What sort of maps do you want?
>
> Ecan has aerial photographs of much (all?) of Canterbury available
> online; you can save them as PNG images. I can make out my house in the
> appropriate one.
> http://www.ecan.govt.nz/EcanGIS/ecanpro/viewer.htm
>
> LINZ ha
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:03:53 +1200 (NZST)
Steve Holdoway wrote:
> We're in Te Ra, which is about 85m up. I've found a poor quality pdf on
> the BP site, which I'll doctor when I get the chance.
>
> At a guess that puts you to the right of the timeball as I look.
Not really, more "up the valley
On 18/08/05, Stephen Irons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> LINZ has topographic maps at 1:5 online, but you can only save these
> as PDF.
> http://www.nztopoonline.linz.govt.nz/website/nztmtopo/terms_cond.htm
Actually, the ones shown in your browser are PNG. You have to find the
right one from y
What sort of maps do you want?
Ecan has aerial photographs of much (all?) of Canterbury available
online; you can save them as PNG images. I can make out my house in the
appropriate one.
http://www.ecan.govt.nz/EcanGIS/ecanpro/viewer.htm
LINZ has topographic maps at 1:5 online, but you ca
PS. Love the favicon (:
We're in Te Ra, which is about 85m up. I've found a poor quality pdf on
the BP site, which I'll doctor when I get the chance.
At a guess that puts you to the right of the timeball as I look. With any
luck, I can see that. I'll jump on the roof ( again! ) tonight with a pair
of binoculars and check
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:57:38 +1200 (NZST)
Steve Holdoway wrote:
> Hey Craig,
>
> Now I'm up and running wireless ( 200mW + 15dbi external aerial! ) I'd
> like to extend your wireless map over the water, but can't find any decent
> pictures to overlay. It made me laugh when testing - there's plen
Hey Craig,
Now I'm up and running wireless ( 200mW + 15dbi external aerial! ) I'd
like to extend your wireless map over the water, but can't find any decent
pictures to overlay. It made me laugh when testing - there's plenty of
open access points!
Have you got any of Diamond Harbour?
Cheers,
St
19 matches
Mail list logo
